Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

08:55
Determining and Controlling External Power Output During Regular Handrim Wheelchair Propulsion
Published on: February 5, 2020
8.0K
Objective and subjective methods for quantifying training load in wheelchair basketball small-sided games
Aitor Iturricastillo1, Cristina Granados1, Asier Los Arcos1
1a Faculty of Education and Sport , University of the Basque Country, UPV/EHU , Vitoria-Gasteiz , Spain.
Journal of Sports Sciences
|May 24, 2016
Summary
This study analyzed training load in wheelchair basketball small-sided games. Heart rate (HR)-based and perceived exertion (RPE)-based methods showed different information, suggesting they can complement each other for training insights.
Area of Science:
- Sports Science
- Physiology
- Biomechanics
Background:
- Training load monitoring is crucial for optimizing athletic performance and preventing overtraining in wheelchair basketball.
- Understanding the relationship between different training load metrics is essential for effective program design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze training load during small-sided games in wheelchair basketball.
- To determine the relationship between heart rate (HR)-based and rating of perceived exertion (RPE)-based training load methods.
Main Methods:
- Collected data from 12 wheelchair basketball players over five weeks.
- Measured HR-based load using Edwards' training load and Stagno's TRIMPmod.
- Assessed RPE-based load using session RPEres (cardiopulmonary) and session RPEmus (muscular).
Main Results:
- Total HR-based loads were 67.5 ± 6.7 AU and 55.3 ± 12.5 AU.
- Total RPE-based loads were 99.3 ± 26.9 AU and 100.8 ± 31.2 AU.
- Higher session RPEmus was observed in later bouts, while other measures did not significantly differ; correlations between HR and RPE methods were trivial to small.
Conclusions:
- HR-based and RPE-based training load methods provide distinct information in wheelchair basketball small-sided games.
- These methods can be complementary, with each offering insights into the limitations of the other for comprehensive training load assessment.

