Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Accessing the Cytotoxicity and Cell Response to Biomaterials
Published on: July 8, 2021
Cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of calcium silicate-based cements on an osteoblast lineage
Ana Lívia Gomes-Cornélio1, Elisandra Márcia Rodrigues1, Leticia Boldrin Mestieri1
1Universidade Estadual Paulista - UNESP, Araraquara School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Araraquara, SP, Brazil.
Abstract:
Several calcium silicate-based biomaterials have been developed in recent years, in addition to Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity and apoptosis/necrosis in human osteoblast cells (SAOS-2) of pure calcium silicate-based cements (CSC) and modified formulations: modified calcium silicate-based cements (CSCM) and three resin-based calcium silicate cements (CSCR1) (CSCR 2) (CSCR3). The following tests were performed after 24 hours of cement extract exposure: methyl-thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT), apoptosis/necrosis assay and comet assay. The negative control (CT-) was performed with untreated cells, and the positive control (CT+) used hydrogen peroxide. The data for MTT and apoptosis were submitted to analysis of variance and Bonferroni's posttest (p < 0.05), and the data for the comet assay analysis, to the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p < 0.05). The MTT test showed no significant difference among the materials in 2 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL concentrations. CSCR3 showed lower cell viability at 10 mg/mL. Only CSC showed lower cell viability at 50 mg/mL. CSCR1, CSCR2 and CSCR3 showed a higher percentage of initial apoptosis than the control in the apoptosis test, after 24 hours exposure. The same cements showed no genotoxicity in the concentration of 2 mg/mL, with the comet assay. CSC and CSCR2 were also not genotoxic at 10 mg/mL. All experimental materials showed viability with MTT. CSC and CSCR2 presented a better response to apoptosis and genotoxicity evaluation in the 10 mg/mL concentration, and demonstrated a considerable potential for use as reparative materials.
Insights
This study assessed the biocompatibility of calcium silicate cements (CSC) and their modified forms in human osteoblast cells. CSC and CSCR2 showed promising results, indicating potential as reparative biomaterials with low cytotoxicity and genotoxicity.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Materials
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Calcium silicate-based biomaterials, including Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA), are increasingly developed.
- Evaluating the biocompatibility of novel calcium silicate cements (CSC) and their modified formulations is crucial for clinical application.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the cytotoxicity, genotoxicity, and apoptosis/necrosis of pure CSC, modified CSC (CSCM), and resin-based CSCR cements.
- To compare the biological responses of human osteoblast cells (SAOS-2) exposed to these cements.
Main Methods:
- Human osteoblast cells (SAOS-2) were exposed to cement extracts for 24 hours.
- Cytotoxicity was evaluated using the methyl-thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay.
- Genotoxicity was assessed via the comet assay, and apoptosis/necrosis was measured using a specific assay.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in cell viability were observed among most materials at 2 mg/mL and 10 mg/mL concentrations via MTT assay.
- CSCR3 showed reduced cell viability at 10 mg/mL, and CSC at 50 mg/mL.
- CSCR1, CSCR2, and CSCR3 exhibited higher initial apoptosis rates compared to controls.
- Comet assay revealed no genotoxicity for any cement at 2 mg/mL; CSC and CSCR2 were also non-genotoxic at 10 mg/mL.
Conclusions:
- All tested experimental materials demonstrated cell viability.
- Calcium silicate cements (CSC) and CSCR2 showed favorable responses in apoptosis and genotoxicity assessments at 10 mg/mL.
- These findings suggest considerable potential for CSC and CSCR2 as reparative biomaterials.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bone Cells and Tissue
Osteoblasts and Osteocytes
The osteoblast is the bone cell responsible for forming new bone tissue. It is found in the growing portions of bone, including the...
Osteoclasts in Bone Remodeling
Mutagenicity and Carcinogenicity
Hormones and Bone Tissue
Hormones That Influence Osteoblasts and/or Maintain the Matrix
Several hormones are necessary for controlling bone growth and maintaining the bone matrix. The pituitary gland secretes growth hormone (GH), which, as its name implies, controls bone growth. This happens in several ways: first, it triggers chondrocyte...
Synthesis and Functions of Calcitonin
The exact mechanisms by which calcitonin operates in calcium homeostasis remain elusive, but its significance is evident in several vital...
Skeleton and Calcium Homeostasis

