Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

2.6K
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
2.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Diagnosis and treatment of vestibular migraine - recent developments and future treatment strategies].

Laryngo- rhino- otologie·2026
Same author

The Epidemiology and Clinical Presentation of the Acute Imbalance Syndrome (AIS)-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

European journal of neurology·2026
Same author

ESTREL-Fatigue-association of levodopa with post-stroke fatigue.

European stroke journal·2026
Same author

The epidemiology and clinical presentation of acute vestibular syndromes: a systematic review of the literature.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same author

The impact of levodopa on post-stroke depression: the ESTREL-depression-study.

European stroke journal·2026
Same author

HINTS+ to diagnose AICA stroke: systematic review of the diagnostic impact of acute unilateral hearing loss in the acute vestibular syndrome.

Journal of neurology·2026
Same journal

Targeting intracranial electrical stimulation to network regions defined within individuals causes network-level effects.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

When "Noise" Isn't Simply Noise: Deterministic Postural Drive During Noisy Galvanic Vestibular Stimulation (nGVS).

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Abrupt Scene Onsets and Gradually Emerging Scene Information Produce Distinct EEG Decoding Dynamics.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

From discovery to translation: charting a course for the <i>Journal of Neurophysiology</i>.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Neuromodulatory Strategies Overcome Multiple Inevitable Impairments of Cerebral Palsy.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same journal

Acute Fentanyl Toxicity:From Opioid-Induced to Hypoxia-Mediated Pathophysiology.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

27.0K

Does gravity influence the visual line bisection task?

A Drakul1, C J Bockisch2, A A Tarnutzer3

  • 1Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland;

Journal of Neurophysiology
|May 27, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gravity does not influence the visual line bisection task (LBT). Studies show headward bias, not gravitational effects, impacts line bisection accuracy when tilted, suggesting attention, not gravity, drives these perceptual biases.

Keywords:
otolith organsperceptionspatial orientationvestibular signal

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

5.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior
09:49

Methods to Explore the Influence of Top-down Visual Processes on Motor Behavior

Published on: April 16, 2014

27.0K
Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

1.0K
Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition
07:45

Assessing Binocular Central Visual Field and Binocular Eye Movements in a Dichoptic Viewing Condition

Published on: July 21, 2020

5.1K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Perception
  • Visuospatial Attention

Background:

  • The visual line bisection task (LBT) reveals visuospatial attention biases, typically leftward for horizontal and upward for vertical lines.
  • While egocentric or allocentric frames may be used, the LBT is not thought to require graviceptive input, unlike the subjective visual vertical.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether graviceptive input influences the LBT by hypothesizing reduced accuracy and precision during head-roll tilt.
  • To determine if body orientation relative to gravity affects performance on the line bisection task.

Main Methods:

  • Twenty healthy subjects performed repetitive line bisections of Earth-horizontal and body-horizontal lines in darkness under varying degrees of roll-tilt (±45°, ±90°).
  • Bisections of Earth-vertical and oblique lines were also recorded in a subset of participants.
  • Data collection occurred before, during, and after tilt periods to assess performance changes.

Main Results:

  • A significant headward shift occurred when bisecting Earth-horizontal (body-vertical) lines at ±90° roll-tilt, but this disappeared after correcting for upright vertical bisection errors.
  • No shifts were observed when bisecting body-horizontal lines during tilt.
  • Precision decreased for Earth-horizontal lines during tilt, but not for body-horizontal lines; scanning direction consistently affected bisection outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The hypothesis that gravity modulates the LBT was rejected; graviceptive input does not appear to be a significant factor.
  • Observed shifts during roll-tilt are attributed to a headward bias when bisecting body-vertical lines, not gravitational influence.
  • Increased variability during tilt likely stems from inherent differences in bisecting body-vertical versus body-horizontal lines.