Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
Published on: March 24, 2023
Participant-generated Cochlear Implant Programs: Speech Recognition, Sound Quality, and Satisfaction.
Robert T Dwyer1, Tony Spahr, Smita Agrawal
1*Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee †Advanced Bionics, LLC, Valencia, California.
Adults with cochlear implants (CI) can successfully program their own devices, showing no performance decline. Patient-programmed CI stimulation levels are not detrimental to outcomes and are preferred by users.
Area of Science:
- Audiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Neuroscience
Background:
- Growing cochlear implant (CI) patient populations and device complexity necessitate improved clinical efficiency.
- Current clinical workflows may not fully meet patient expectations or optimize device performance.
- Clinician workload and responsibility are increasing, highlighting the need for streamlined fitting processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if patient-derived programming of cochlear implant (CI) stimulation levels impacts performance outcomes.
- To compare patient-created CI programs with clinician-provided baseline programs.
- To assess patient satisfaction and perceived ease of use with self-programming.
Main Methods:
- A within-participant study involving 18 postlingually deafened adult CI recipients.
- Comparison of a baseline listening program with a self-created experimental program.
- Evaluation of audiological measures including sound-field thresholds, word recognition, speech understanding in quiet and noise, and spectral modulation detection (SMD).
Main Results:
- No significant group differences were found in most audiological tests between baseline and self-programmed CI settings.
- A subset of participants showed improvements in speech understanding in noise with self-programmed settings.
- Participants reported higher satisfaction and perceived greater ease of use with the self-programming process compared to traditional methods.
Conclusions:
- Experienced adult CI users can independently set stimulation levels without adverse effects on performance.
- Patient-driven CI programming is a viable and preferred alternative to traditional fitting, potentially improving efficiency.
- Self-programming may enhance user engagement and satisfaction with cochlear implant technology.
More Related Videos
07:00Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
04:32Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
Published on: December 20, 2024