Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Auditory-Visual Stroop Test to Assess Subjects with Tinnitus.

Brain sciences·2026
Same author

Optimizing developmental outcomes in premature infants through a multidisciplinary approach to care.

Pediatric research·2026
Same author

Hearing and Balance in Adult Patients with a History of Traumatic Brain Injury.

International archives of otorhinolaryngology·2026
Same author

Applications of the Stroop Paradigm in Tinnitus: a Scoping Review.

Brain and behavior·2025
Same author

Auditory Electrophysiology of an Adolescent with Both Language and Learning Disorders.

Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Auditory Steady-State Responses for Detecting Mild Hearing Loss in Babies, Infants, and Children: Literature Review.

Life (Basel, Switzerland)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K

Temporal processing and long-latency auditory evoked potential in stutterers.

Raquel Prestes1, Adriana Neves de Andrade1, Renata Beatriz Fernandes Santos1

  • 1Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Departamento de Fonoaudiologia, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
|May 29, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Individuals who stutter exhibit deficits in temporal processing and show delayed auditory evoked potential responses (N2 and P3 components). These findings highlight neuroaudiological differences in stuttering.

Keywords:
Auditory evoked potentialAuditory processing disorderDistúrbio do processamento auditivoGagueira adultaPotencial evocado auditivoStuttering adult

More Related Videos

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents
10:27

The Power of Interstimulus Interval for the Assessment of Temporal Processing in Rodents

Published on: April 19, 2019

7.4K
A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
12:03

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials

Published on: May 25, 2019

9.0K
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills
09:27

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Link Between Time Perception of Visual Stimuli and Reading Skills

Published on: January 19, 2024

1.8K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Auditory Neuroscience

Background:

  • Stuttering is a speech fluency disorder.
  • It may involve neuroaudiological factors affecting central auditory processing.
  • Impaired auditory processing skills and temporal resolution are implicated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate temporal processing abilities in stutterers.
  • To analyze long-latency auditory evoked potentials (LAEPs) in stutterers.
  • To compare these measures between stutterers and non-stutterers.

Main Methods:

  • 41 right-handed participants (20 stutterers, 21 non-stutterers), aged 18-46.
  • Tests included Duration Pattern, Random Gap Detection, and LAEPs.
  • Groups were matched for age, education, and sex.

Main Results:

  • Stutterers performed worse on Duration Pattern and Random Gap Detection tests.
  • Stutterers exhibited longer N2 and P3 latencies in LAEPs.
  • Significant differences were observed in temporal processing and LAEPs.

Conclusions:

  • Stutterers demonstrate impaired temporal processing.
  • Elevated N2 and P3 latencies in LAEPs are characteristic of stutterers.
  • Findings suggest neuroaudiological underpinnings of stuttering related to auditory processing.