Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternative materials for three endosseous implants.

M R Rieger1, W K Adams, G L Kinzel

  • 1University of Texas Medical Center, Dental Branch, Houston.

The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|June 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why peer discussion improves student performance on in-class concept questions.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2009
Same author

Mechanical properties of sintered hydroxyapatite and tricalcium phosphate ceramic.

Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine·2004
Same author

Force transducer design: a new approach combining nonlinear finite element analysis and robust design.

Biomedical sciences instrumentation·2001
Same author

Analysis of nickel-titanium versus stainless steel instrumentation by means of direct digital imaging.

Journal of endodontics·1996
Same author

Enhancement of standardized radiographs.

The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society·1995
Same author

Dental implant loading.

The Journal of the Greater Houston Dental Society·1995
Same journal

Influence of bruxism on occlusal force distribution in maxillary implant-supported overdentures: A finite element analysis study.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Letter to the Editor regarding, "A prospective single arm study of salivary cortisol changes in muscular temporomandibular disorders patients following computer-guided occlusal adjustments".

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Response to Letter to the Editor regarding "Restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A cost-effectiveness analysis of a one-piece endodontic crown versus a complete crown".

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Biologic complications and implant survival rates associated with implant-supported fixed complete dental prostheses. A clinical study with a mean 29-month follow-up from implant placement.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Striving for trueness: Effect of face scanning on implant planning and interim prosthesis in implant supported prosthesis; A parallel randomized blinded clinical trial.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
Same journal

Erosive-abrasive effects on optical and surface properties of 3D printed resins with different surface finishing: An in vitro study.

The Journal of prosthetic dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Dental implant geometry significantly impacts stress distribution. Optimal material selection for dental implants depends on geometry to prevent excessive stress on jawbone, with finned designs showing promise with titanium alloy.

Area of Science:

  • Biomaterials Science
  • Dental Implantology
  • Mechanical Engineering

Background:

  • Endosseous dental implants are crucial for tooth replacement.
  • Understanding material-bone interaction is key for implant success.
  • Previous research has explored various implant designs and materials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate three distinct endosseous post-type implant geometries.
  • To analyze the effect of varying material stiffness (moduli of elasticity) on stress distribution.
  • To determine optimal material-geometry pairings for dental implants.

Main Methods:

  • Three implant geometries were analyzed: serrated solid, cylindrical screw-type solid, and finned solid.
  • Each geometry was evaluated with 10 different moduli of elasticity.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stress contour plots were generated to visualize stress distribution and identify optimal material pairings.

    • Main Results:

    • Increased material stiffness transmitted more occlusal load to the apical bone across all geometries.
    • Excessive stiffness led to increased punching stresses at the implant apex.
    • The finned solid implant geometry was best suited for titanium alloy; the screw-type for aluminum or titanium; the serrated implant was too stiff for polycrystalline alumina.

    Conclusions:

    • Implant geometry is a critical factor in effectively distributing stress to the bone.
    • Material stiffness must be carefully matched to implant geometry to avoid detrimental stress concentrations.
    • Titanium alloy is a suitable material for finned solid dental implants.