Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
Eye Movements during Auditory Attention Predict Individual Differences in Dorsal Attention Network Activity
Rodrigo M Braga1, Richard Z Fu2, Barry M Seemungal2
1Computational, Cognitive and Clinical Neuroimaging Laboratory, Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital CampusLondon, UK; Center for Brain Science, Harvard UniversityCambridge, MA, USA; Aathinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical ImagingCharlestown, MA, USA.
Auditory attention involves eye movements, with activity in the superior parietal lobes (SPL) and frontal eye fields (FEF) partly reflecting oculomotor processes during non-visual attention.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Auditory Neuroscience
Background:
- The neural basis of auditory attention, particularly the role of the dorsal frontoparietal network, remains incompletely understood.
- This network, including the frontal eye fields (FEF) and superior parietal lobes (SPL), is implicated in spatial attention across senses and contains retinotopic maps.
- The recruitment of FEF and SPL during auditory attention may involve crossmodal oculomotor processes, but this requires experimental validation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether eye movements evoked during an auditory task predict neural activity in the dorsal frontoparietal network.
- To determine if overt crossmodal oculomotor processes contribute to auditory attention.
Main Methods:
- Utilized functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and on-line eye-tracking during spatial and non-spatial auditory tasks.
- No visual stimuli or cues were presented to isolate auditory processing and associated eye movements.
Main Results:
- Auditory tasks elicited systematic eye movements, with saccade rate and gaze position correlating with attentional engagement and sound location, respectively.
- Activity related to evoked eye movements showed dissociation between the SPL and FEF.
- Observed eye movements did not fully explain the activation within the frontoparietal network.
Conclusions:
- Recruitment of the SPL and FEF during attentive listening partly reflects overt crossmodal oculomotor processes in non-visual attention.
- Further research is needed to clarify whether the remaining network activation involves covert crossmodal processes or direct auditory information manipulation.
More Related Videos
09:37Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
06:46Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
Published on: March 18, 2019