Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

11.0K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
11.0K
Surveys02:16

Surveys

17.2K
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.
17.2K
Data Collection by Experiments01:13

Data Collection by Experiments

28.0K
Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method of data collection that involves the manipulation of the samples by applying some form of treatment prior to data collection. It refers to manipulating one variable to determine its changes on another variable. The sample subjected to treatment is known as “experimental units.”
An example of the experimental method is a public...
28.0K
The Stanford Prison Experiment03:20

The Stanford Prison Experiment

25.0K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
25.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Naturalistic Observations02:30

Naturalistic Observations

17.9K
If you want to understand how behavior occurs, one of the best ways to gain information is to simply observe the behavior in its natural context. However, people might change their behavior in unexpected ways if they know they are being observed. How do researchers obtain accurate information when people tend to hide their natural behavior? As an example, imagine that your professor asks everyone in your class to raise their hand if they always wash their hands after using the restroom. Chances...
17.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Psychology's Questionable Research Fundamentals (QRFs): Key problems in quantitative psychology and psychological measurement beyond Questionable Research Practices (QRPs).

Frontiers in psychology·2025
Same author

People, places, things and communities: expanding behaviour settings theory in the twenty-first century.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2024
Same author

Reorienting psychological science.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2024
Same author

Moral Judgment as Categorization (MJAC).

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2021
Same author

Statements About the Pervasiveness of Behavior Require Data About the Pervasiveness of Behavior.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same author

Editorial: Enaction and Ecological Psychology: Convergences and Complementarities.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same journal

From silenced shock to strategic resilience: a longitudinal qualitative study of nurse residents' trajectory in coping with patient verbal abuse.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Validation of the Internet Addiction Test (IAT) for forest firefighters: implications for human-technology interaction and occupational safety in the future of work.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Development and validation of the football emotion scale for Chinese youth players: a psychometric study.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

From online engagement to offline action: how social media environmental engagement shapes university students' pro-environmental citizenship through intrinsic motivation and personal norms.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

The multidimensional inventory of religious/spiritual wellbeing in Hungarian language: psychometric properties and initial validation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same journal

Effects of occupational factors on depression in Chinese veterans: a fsQCA study based on 2022 CFPS data.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

10.0K

Sampling Participants' Experience in Laboratory Experiments: Complementary Challenges for More Complete Data

Alan McAuliffe1, Marek McGann1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Mary Immaculate College, University of Limerick Limerick, Ireland.

Frontiers in Psychology
|June 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study questions the reliability of using the mean in psychological research. It proposes a new controlled descriptive experience sampling method to better understand the relationship between subjective experience and behavior.

Keywords:
averagesmixed-methodsphenomenologyqualitative methodsvalidity

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

10.0K
Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios
07:43

Author Spotlight: A Novel Setup to Conduct Naturalistic Laboratory Experiments with Real Human Actors in Scenarios

Published on: August 4, 2023

2.8K
A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Behavioral Science

Background:

  • The uncritical use of the mean in psychological research raises concerns about data reliability and validity.
  • Understanding the relationship between subjective experience and behavior is crucial but poorly understood.
  • Existing methods for studying experience have limitations in either ecological validity or behavioral measurement precision.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To interrogate the validity of the mean in psychological research.
  • To explore the role of subjective experience in understanding behavioral data.
  • To propose a novel methodology for integrating experience and behavior in experimental settings.

Main Methods:

  • Review of historical and contemporary approaches to studying the experience-behavior relationship.
  • Critique of "wide" (naturalistic) and "narrow" (controlled) experience sampling methods.
  • Proposal and adaptation of controlled descriptive experience sampling for laboratory settings.

Main Results:

  • Current methods for studying experience and behavior are often dichotomized, leading to trade-offs in accuracy and ecological validity.
  • A "mid-range" sampling technique is needed to bridge the gap between naturalistic observation and controlled experimentation.
  • Controlled descriptive experience sampling offers a potential solution for calibrating experimental means with the meaning of participant experiences.

Conclusions:

  • Rethinking the use of the mean requires a deeper understanding of individual experiences.
  • Controlled descriptive experience sampling provides a novel tool for psychological research.
  • This method can enhance the validity and interpretability of experimental findings by linking behavioral data with subjective experience.