Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Scanning Skeletal Remains for Bone Mineral Density in Forensic Contexts
Published on: January 29, 2018
Defining small-for-gestational-age: prescriptive versus descriptive birthweight standards
Liset Hoftiezer1, Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven2, Marije Hogeveen3
1Princess Amalia Department of Paediatrics, Department of Neonatology, P.O. Box 10400, 8000 GK, Isala, Zwolle, The Netherlands. l.hoftiezer@isala.nl.
Insights
A new prescriptive birthweight standard identifies more infants as small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes compared to traditional descriptive standards. This improved identification aids in better neonatal care for growth-restricted infants.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Perinatal Medicine
- Pediatric Growth Assessment
Background:
- Descriptive birthweight standards have limited sensitivity in identifying infants with growth impairment and associated adverse outcomes.
- Prescriptive standards, based on a healthy subpopulation, may offer superior detection of intrauterine growth restriction.
- Existing research suggests prescriptive standards could enhance the identification of very preterm infants at risk of intraventricular hemorrhage.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a prescriptive birthweight standard for improved detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants.
- To compare the sensitivity and specificity of prescriptive versus descriptive birthweight standards in predicting adverse neonatal outcomes.
- To assess the clinical utility of prescriptive standards in identifying infants at risk for both major and minor adverse neonatal outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Creation of two birthweight standards (descriptive and prescriptive) using data from live-born, singleton infants (24-42 weeks gestation) in the Netherlands (2000-2007).
- Inclusion criteria for the prescriptive standard: infants without congenital malformations, born to healthy mothers after uncomplicated pregnancies.
- Definition of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) as birthweight <10th percentile; assessment of prediction for adverse neonatal outcomes.
Main Results:
- The prescriptive standard identified significantly more infants as SGA (up to 38.0% at 29 weeks gestation).
- SGA infants identified by the prescriptive standard, or both standards, showed increased risk for major and minor adverse neonatal outcomes.
- The prescriptive standard demonstrated higher sensitivity (e.g., +42.6% for bronchopulmonary dysplasia) and lower specificity (e.g., -26.9% for intraventricular hemorrhage) in specific gestational age windows.
Conclusions:
- Prescriptive birthweight standards offer improved identification of SGA infants at risk for adverse neonatal outcomes.
- These standards enhance the detection of both preterm and term SGA infants requiring closer monitoring.
- The enhanced sensitivity of prescriptive standards aids in identifying infants with potentially harmful minor adverse outcomes.
Unlabelled:
Descriptive population-based birthweight standards possess low sensitivity in detecting infants with growth impairment. A prescriptive birthweight standard based on a 'healthy' subpopulation without risk factors for intrauterine growth restriction might be superior. We created two birthweight standards based on live born, singleton infants with gestational age 24-42 weeks and born in The Netherlands between 2000 and 2007. Inclusion criteria for the prescriptive birthweight standard were restricted to infants without congenital malformations, born to healthy mothers after uncomplicated pregnancies. We defined small-for-gestational-age (SGA) as birthweight <10th percentile and assessed the ability of both standards to predict adverse neonatal outcomes. The prescriptive birthweight standard identified significantly more infants as SGA, up to 38.0 % at 29 weeks gestation. SGA infants classified according to both standards as well as those classified according to the prescriptive birthweight standard only, were at increased risk of both major and minor adverse neonatal outcomes. The prescriptive birthweight standard was both more sensitive and less specific, with a maximum increase in sensitivity predicting bronchopulmonary dysplasia (+42.6 %) and a maximum decrease in specificity predicting intraventricular haemorrhage (-26.9 %) in infants aged 28-31 weeks.
Conclusion:
Prescriptive birthweight standards could improve identification of infants born SGA and at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.
What Is Known:
• Descriptive birthweight standards possess low sensitivity in detecting growth restricted infants at risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. • Prescriptive standards could improve identification of very preterm small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants at risk of intraventricular haemorrhage. What is New: • Prescriptive standards identify more preterm and term SGA infants at risk of major adverse neonatal outcomes. • Late preterm and term SGA infants classified according to the prescriptive standard are at increased risk of minor adverse neonatal outcomes with potentially harmful implications.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
z Scores and Area Under the Curve
Normal Distribution
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Diabetes Mellitus: Type 2 and Gestational
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.
Regression Toward the Mean

