Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 20, 2026

Biobank for Translational Medicine: Standard Operating Procedures for Optimal Sample Management
Published on: November 30, 2022
Biobanking and Privacy in India.
Sachin Chaturvedi1, Krishna Ravi Srinivas1, Vasantha Muthuswamy1
1Sachin Chaturvedi, Ph.D., is Director General of RIS and was Global Justice Fellow at the Yale University. He has written on technology and regulation and Science, Technology and Innovation issues and has been a consultant for many organizations of the UN and departments of Government of India. Krishna Ravi Srinivas, Ph.D., is a consultant with RIS and holds a PhD from National Law School University of India. He has written on intellectual property rights and biotechnology regulation and is Managing Editor of Asian Biotechnology and Development Review (ABDR). Vasantha Muthuswamy, M.D., was Senior Deputy Director General and Chief of the Division of Basic Medical Sciences, Traditional Medicine and Bioethics, and the Division of Reproductive Health and Nutrition, of the Indian Council of Medical Research. She is recognized as a pioneer in bioethics policy and regulation in India and has worked with WHO and other agencies on bioethics.
Indian biobank research relies on Indian Council for Medical Research guidelines, lacking specific laws for biobanking and privacy. New legislation is needed to address these gaps and protect participant rights while enabling research.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical Research
- Health Law
- Bioethics
Background:
- Indian statutory law does not specifically regulate biobank-based research.
- The Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines are the primary regulatory framework.
- Existing legal landscape presents challenges regarding privacy rights in research.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the current legal and regulatory status of biobank research in India.
- To identify gaps in statutory law concerning biobanking and privacy.
- To propose recommendations for future legislation to facilitate biobank research.
Main Methods:
- Review of Indian statutory law, constitutional provisions, and common law.
- Analysis of Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines for biobanking.
- Comparative consideration of international biobanking and privacy standards.
Main Results:
- Absence of specific biobanking legislation in India.
- ICMR guidelines permit broad consent and flexible specimen identification.
- Indian courts have limited privacy rights in favor of public interest; no established privacy test exists in common law.
Conclusions:
- India requires specific statutory law for biobanking to address regulatory and privacy concerns.
- Legislation should consider international best practices while respecting India's unique legal and cultural context.
- Addressing privacy lacunae is crucial for facilitating ethical and robust biobank research in India.
Related Concept Videos
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy...
Ethical Standards I
The Code of Ethics provisions outline the nurse's duty to the patient, the healthcare team, the profession, and society. The Code's fundamental principles include advocacy,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Ethics in Research
Ethics and Bioethics

