Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

06:30
Generation of a Simplified Three-Dimensional Skin-on-a-chip Model in a Micromachined Microfluidic Platform
Published on: May 17, 2021
5.0K
Multiscale modelling approaches for assessing cosmetic ingredients safety
Frédéric Y Bois1, Juan G Diaz Ochoa2, Monika Gajewska3
1INERIS, DRC/VIVA/METO, Parc ALATA, BP2, 60550 Verneuil-en-Halatte, France.
Toxicology
|June 9, 2016
Summary
The COSMOS project advances in silico and in vitro methods for cosmetic safety, integrating pharmacokinetic modeling and cellular data. These complementary approaches predict toxic effects without animal testing, addressing data challenges.
Area of Science:
- Toxicology
- Computational Biology
- Pharmacokinetics
Background:
- The European Union's ban on animal testing for cosmetics drives innovation in alternative methods.
- In silico and in vitro approaches are crucial for assessing cosmetic ingredient and product safety.
- The COSMOS project focuses on developing predictive models for toxicological endpoints.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present the main models and results from the COSMOS project on in silico and in vitro alternatives.
- To demonstrate the integration of multiscale pharmacokinetic modeling with in vitro data.
- To highlight the complementary nature of mathematical modeling and experimental assays.
Main Methods:
- Organelle and cellular level analysis.
- Continuous monitoring of cell-level effects.
- Development of multiscale physiologically based pharmacokinetic and effect models.
- Route-to-route extrapolation techniques.
- Automated KNIME workflows for model dissemination and usability.
Main Results:
- Successful application of multiscale pharmacokinetic modeling for predicting kinetics and toxic effects.
- Integration of in vitro data to enhance predictive accuracy.
- Development of user-friendly workflows for accessing and utilizing the models.
- Identification of challenges in handling large datasets and complex computations.
Conclusions:
- In silico and in vitro methods are complementary and essential for cosmetic safety assessment.
- The COSMOS project provides valuable tools and insights for regulatory science.
- Further advancements are needed to address computational and data management challenges in predictive toxicology.
Related Concept Videos
Multicompartment Models: Overview
687
Multicompartment models are mathematical constructs that depict how drugs are distributed and eliminated within the body. They segment the body into several compartments, symbolizing various physiological or anatomical areas connected through drug transfer processes such as absorption, metabolism, distribution, and elimination.
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
These models offer a more comprehensive representation of drug behavior in the body than one-compartment models. They accommodate the complexity of drug distribution,...
687
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
319
Mechanistic models are utilized in individual analysis using single-source data, but imperfections arise due to data collection errors, preventing perfect prediction of observed data. The mathematical equation involves known values (Xi), observed concentrations (Ci), measurement errors (εi), model parameters (ϕj), and the related function (ƒi) for i number of values. Different least-squares metrics quantify differences between predicted and observed values. The ordinary least...
319
Toxicity Testing in Animals
107
Toxicity tests in animals are grounded on two main assumptions: first, the effects observed in laboratory animals can be extrapolated to humans, especially when adjusted for body surface area; second, high-dose exposure in animals is essential to identify potential human hazards from lower doses. This is based on the quantal dose-response concept, which faces the challenge of extrapolating results from relatively few test animals to much larger human populations. For example, a 0.01% incidence...
107

