Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Why do we argue about the specialness of the social sciences?

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2026
Same author

Unity or disunity of the sciences? The German debate around 1900.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2025
Same author

Disagreement, Certainties, Relativism.

Topoi : an international review of philosophy·2021
Same author

The genealogical method in epistemology.

Synthese·2020
Same author

Epistemic relativism, scepticism, pluralism.

Synthese·2019
Same author

Scientific pluralism and the Chemical Revolution.

Studies in history and philosophy of science·2015

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K

Relativism in Feyerabend's later writings.

Martin Kusch1

  • 1Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Austria.

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science
|June 9, 2016
PubMed
Summary

This paper explores Paul Feyerabend's later philosophical writings, distinguishing his varied forms of relativism. It analyzes his political and ontological relativism, linking them to skepticism and constructivism.

Keywords:
Epistemic relativismFeyerabendOntological relativismPluralismPolitical relativismRelativism

More Related Videos

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
10:07

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks

Published on: December 2, 2015

28.1K
Medium Preparation for the Cultivation of Microorganisms under Strictly Anaerobic/Anoxic Conditions
06:17

Medium Preparation for the Cultivation of Microorganisms under Strictly Anaerobic/Anoxic Conditions

Published on: August 15, 2019

30.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
08:33

A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences

Published on: September 4, 2019

7.6K
Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks
10:07

Using Fiberless, Wearable fNIRS to Monitor Brain Activity in Real-world Cognitive Tasks

Published on: December 2, 2015

28.1K
Medium Preparation for the Cultivation of Microorganisms under Strictly Anaerobic/Anoxic Conditions
06:17

Medium Preparation for the Cultivation of Microorganisms under Strictly Anaerobic/Anoxic Conditions

Published on: August 15, 2019

30.2K

Area of Science:

  • Philosophy of Science
  • Epistemology

Background:

  • Paul Feyerabend's later works, including "Science in a Free Society" and "Farewell to Reason," present complex and evolving views on relativism.
  • Previous interpretations often oversimplify Feyerabend's nuanced positions on cultural exchange and knowledge systems.

Observation:

  • Feyerabend's "Science in a Free Society" develops political relativism while rejecting simplistic models of cultural exchange.
  • "Farewell to Reason" introduces novel forms of relativism, connecting them to skepticism and infallibilism.
  • Feyerabend critiques a radical, possibly non-existent, form of relativism and proposes an "ontological" relativism.

Findings:

  • The paper identifies and differentiates distinct relativistic frameworks within Feyerabend's late philosophy.
  • It highlights the under-argued nature of his political relativism and the innovative, albeit complex, aspects of his later epistemological stances.
  • Feyerabend's "ontological" relativism integrates Kantian humility, metaphysical pluralism, and constructivist elements.

Implications:

  • Understanding Feyerabend's diverse relativisms offers new perspectives on the philosophy of science and cultural studies.
  • This analysis clarifies Feyerabend's critique of established epistemological norms and his engagement with skepticism.
  • The study provides a foundation for further research into constructivist and pluralist approaches in contemporary philosophy.