Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

09:00
Insect-controlled Robot: A Mobile Robot Platform to Evaluate the Odor-tracking Capability of an Insect
Published on: December 19, 2016
15.4K
Small or far away? Size and distance perception in the praying mantis
Vivek Nityananda1, Geoffrey Bissianna2, Ghaith Tarawneh3
1Institute of Neuroscience, Henry Wellcome Building for Neuroecology, Newcastle University, Framlington Place, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK vivek.nityananda@ncl.ac.uk.
Summary
Praying mantises do not use stereo vision for size constancy. Their striking behavior indicates they do not gauge prey size using 3D visual cues, suggesting other evolutionary advantages for this complex vision.
Area of Science:
- * Neuroethology and comparative vision research.
- * Investigating the evolution of sensory systems in insects.
Background:
- * Stereo vision, or 3D vision, is a complex trait found across diverse animal lineages, including primates, birds, and insects.
- * Potential evolutionary advantages include enhanced range finding, improved camouflage breaking, and accurate object size estimation.
- * The selective pressures driving the evolution of stereo vision remain an active area of research.
Purpose of the Study:
- * To determine if praying mantises utilize stereo vision to estimate prey size through disparity and angular size cues.
- * To test for size constancy, where an organism perceives an object's size as constant despite changes in its retinal image size due to distance.
- * To explore the role of 3D visual cues in the predatory behavior of mantises.
Main Methods:
- * A novel insect 3D cinema paradigm was employed to present virtual prey to praying mantises.
- * Virtual prey stimuli manipulated disparity cues (implying distance) and angular size cues.
- * The number of strikes by mantises was recorded as a measure of prey selection.
Main Results:
- * Mantises exhibited peak striking behavior when virtual prey implied a distance of 2.5 cm.
- * A significant decrease in strikes occurred as the implied distance increased beyond 2.5 cm.
- * No evidence of size constancy was observed; mantises did not preferentially strike prey of a specific physical size across simulated distances.
Conclusions:
- * Praying mantises do not appear to use stereo vision for estimating absolute object size or achieving size constancy.
- * The interaction between simulated distance and angular size suggests complex processing but not size constancy.
- * Evolutionary drivers for stereo vision in mantises likely stem from advantages other than precise size estimation, such as depth perception for capture.

