Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

9.3K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
9.3K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

520
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
520
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

355
Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
355
Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

692
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
692
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

370
Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
370

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Accelerating wastewater-based SARS-CoV-2 surveillance using a mobile laboratory in mixed infrastructure regions.

The Science of the total environment·2026
Same author

Birth-size reference charts for normal nursery newborns between 35.0 and 41.6 weeks.

BMC pediatrics·2026
Same author

Pregnancy as a journey of care and connection: Indigenous women's experiences navigating health systems and community support.

Frontiers in public health·2026
Same author

Perceptions of maternal mortality and risk factors among American Indian/Alaska Native respondents in Missouri.

American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM·2026
Same author

Integrating Social Drivers of Health With Strengths-Based Approaches in Clinical Care.

AJPM focus·2026
Same author

Relation between Time from Onset to Randomization and Benefit Magnitude in Recent Clinical Trials of Thrombectomy for Patients with Large Ischemic Cores.

Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K

A novel evaluation of optimality for randomized controlled trials.

Jo Wick1, Scott M Berry1,2, Hung-Wen Yeh1,3

  • 1a Department of Biostatistics , The University of Kansas Medical Center , Kansas City , Kansas , USA.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|June 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Bayesian adaptive designs (BADs) may be less powerful, but fixed two-arm designs are suboptimal when considering community benefits. A novel approach reveals fixed designs are the least favorable study option.

Keywords:
AccrualAmerican Indianscommunity based participatory researchlongitudinal

More Related Videos

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.3K
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.4K
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.7K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical trial design
  • Biostatistics
  • Health services research

Background:

  • Balanced two-arm designs offer higher statistical power than unbalanced ones.
  • Bayesian adaptive designs (BADs) can exhibit reduced power compared to traditional designs.
  • Fixed two-arm designs may be suboptimal when community and subject benefits are prioritized.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify the optimal two-arm study design by integrating statistical power and community perception.
  • To evaluate competing study designs using a novel, multi-criteria approach.
  • To determine the most favorable design considering both efficacy and ethical implications.

Main Methods:

  • Employed Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) to assess multiple optimality criteria simultaneously.
  • Compared the performance of various two-arm study designs, including fixed and adaptive approaches.
  • Incorporated both statistical efficiency and community-centric metrics into the analysis.

Main Results:

  • The fixed two-arm design demonstrated significant deficiencies in subject- and community-specific benefits.
  • When considering a broader set of criteria beyond statistical power, the fixed design emerged as the least favorable.
  • The novel DEA approach provided a comprehensive performance ranking of different study designs.

Conclusions:

  • Fixed two-arm designs are suboptimal when community and subject benefits are key considerations.
  • A multi-criteria evaluation, including community perception, is crucial for selecting the best study design.
  • Future research should explore adaptive designs that better balance statistical rigor with ethical and community-focused outcomes.