Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Three-dimensional Super Resolution Microscopy of F-actin Filaments by Interferometric PhotoActivated Localization Microscopy iPALM
Published on: December 1, 2016
Planar Structure-from-Motion with Affine Camera Models: Closed-Form Solutions, Ambiguities and Degeneracy Analysis
Toby Collins1, Adrien Bartoli1
1ALCoV-ISIT (CNRS), Université d'Auvergne, Clermont Ferrand, France.
Abstract:
Planar Structure-from-Motion (SfM) is the problem of reconstructing a planar object or surface from a set of 2D images using motion information. The problem is well-understood with the perspective camera model and can be solved with Homography Decomposition (HD). However when the structure is small and/or viewed far from the camera the perspective effects diminish, and in the limit the projections become affine. In these situations HD fails because the problem itself becomes ill-posed. We propose a stable alternative using affine camera models. These have been used extensively to reconstruct non-planar structures, however a general, accurate and closed-form method for planar structures has been missing. The problem is fundamentally different with planar structures because the types of affine camera models one can use are more restricted and it is inherently more ambiguous and non-linear. We provide a closed-form method for the orthographic camera model that solves the general problem (three or more views with three or more correspondences and missing correspondences) and returns all metric structure solutions and corresponding camera poses. The method does not require initialisation, and optimises an objective function that is very similar to the reprojection error. In fact there is no clear benefit in refining its solutions with bundle adjustment, which is a remarkable result. We also present a new theoretical analysis that deepens our understanding of the problem. The main result is the necessary and sufficient geometric conditions for the problem to be degenerate with the orthographic camera. We also show there can exist up to two solutions for metric structure with four or more views (previously it was assumed to be unique), and we give the necessary and sufficient geometric conditions for disambiguation. Other theoretical results include showing that in the case of three images the optimal reconstruction (with respect to reprojection error) can usually be found in closed-form, and additional prior knowledge needed to solve with non-orthographic affine cameras.
Related Concept Videos
Planar Rigid-Body Motion
Planar motion is typically divided into three distinct categories. The first is rectilinear translation, demonstrated by a subway train that moves along...
Curvilinear Motion: Rectangular Components
As the car advances, its position evolves over time. Quantifying the car's velocity involves computing the...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
Absolute Motion Analysis- General Plane Motion
As the drone's propellers rotate, an upward force is generated that counteracts the force of gravity, enabling the drone to lift off from the ground. This initial movement of the drone is along a straight path, representing a form of translational motion. In this phase, every point on the...
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
Kinematic Equations for Rotation
For instance, imagine a point A on a rigid body engaged in circular motion. The translational velocity of this particular point can be calculated by taking the time derivatives of the displacement equation, which essentially measures the...

