Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Fit for purpose? Introducing a rational priority setting approach into a community care setting
Evelyn Cornelissen1, Craig Mitton2, Alan Davidson3
1Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada AND Centre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) can aid resource allocation, but its effectiveness depends on contextual fit. This study found that timing and application form hindered PBMA success, highlighting the need for readiness assessments.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Health Economics
- Decision Science
Background:
- Program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) is a recognized approach for resource allocation and priority setting in healthcare.
- Existing research confirms PBMA's efficacy but notes that contextual factors can impede its successful implementation and effectiveness.
- Understanding these contextual factors is crucial for optimizing PBMA's application in real-world settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To qualitatively explore the effectiveness of Program budgeting and marginal analysis (PBMA) implementation.
- To gain insights into decision-makers' perceptions of PBMA's usability, acceptability, and fit within their specific organizational context.
- To identify barriers and facilitators influencing PBMA adoption and effectiveness.
Main Methods:
- A Canadian case study involving qualitative data collection through interviews with decision-makers.
- Interviews were conducted at three time points: pre-implementation, post-year-1, and post-year-2 of PBMA.
- Data analysis focused on perceptions of baseline priority setting, desired practices, and PBMA's usability and acceptability.
Main Results:
- 'Fit'—encompassing desirability, acceptability, and usability—emerged as a critical factor for PBMA effectiveness.
- While decision-makers desired rational approaches like PBMA, the timing and application format were perceived as unsuitable for the case study context.
- Barriers to PBMA adoption included leadership changes, limited organizational commitment, and concerns about organizational capacity, which negatively impacted effectiveness.
Conclusions:
- Effective implementation of PBMA requires careful consideration of contextual factors, particularly the 'fit' between the approach and the organization's needs and readiness.
- Recommendations include incorporating a contextual readiness/capacity assessment stage into PBMA processes.
- Recognizing organizational complexity and considering incremental adoption strategies can enhance PBMA's success and advance evidence-informed decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Planning Nursing Care I
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Ethical Dilemmas II

