Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
Published on: August 30, 2016
Quantification of the pivot-shift test using a navigation system with non-invasive surface markers.
Shugo Maeda1, Eiichi Tsuda2, Yuji Yamamoto2
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, 5 Zaifu-cho, Hirosaki, Aomori, 036-8562, Japan. s-maeda@hirosaki-u.ac.jp.
This study validates using non-invasive surface markers with navigation systems to quantify the pivot-shift test in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries. Results show moderate correlation with traditional methods, offering a less invasive option for assessing knee kinematics.
Area of Science:
- Orthopedic surgery
- Biomechanical analysis
- Medical device validation
Background:
- The pivot-shift test is crucial for diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries.
- Accurate quantification of the pivot-shift phenomenon is essential for surgical planning and outcomes.
- Current methods for measuring knee kinematics during the pivot-shift test often rely on invasive pin-fixed markers.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate a navigation system utilizing non-invasive surface markers for quantifying the pivot-shift phenomenon.
- To compare measurements obtained with surface markers against those from traditional pin-fixed markers.
- To assess the correlation between surface marker measurements and clinical grading of the pivot-shift test.
Main Methods:
- Seventy patients with ACL injuries underwent assessment under general anesthesia.
- Knee kinematics during the pivot-shift test were recorded using an image-free navigation system with either surface markers or pin-fixed markers.
- Posterior tibial reduction (PTR) was calculated and compared between the two marker types and with clinical grades.
Main Results:
- The pivot-shift phenomenon was identifiable in all patients via the navigation system.
- Posterior tibial reduction (PTR) measured with surface markers showed moderate correlation with pin-fixed markers (ρ=0.524, p<0.001).
- Moderate correlations were observed between clinical grades and PTRs obtained using both surface markers (ρ=0.522, p<0.001) and pin-fixed markers (ρ=0.645, p<0.001).
Conclusions:
- Posterior tibial reduction (PTR) during the pivot-shift test can be quantified in ACL-injured knees using a navigation system with surface markers.
- Measurements from surface markers moderately correlate with both pin-fixed marker measurements and clinical pivot-shift grades.
- This non-invasive method using surface markers offers a viable approach for assessing knee kinematics in ACL-injured and reconstructed knees.
More Related Videos
07:43In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021
09:46MPI CyberMotion Simulator: Implementation of a Novel Motion Simulator to Investigate Multisensory Path Integration in Three Dimensions
Published on: May 10, 2012