Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 19, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
External validation of the IMPROVE Bleeding Risk Assessment Model in medical patients
David J Rosenberg, Anne Press, Joanna Fishbein
1Alex C. Spyropoulos, MD, FACP, FCCP, FRCPC, Hofstra, North Shore - LIJ School of Medicine, Lenox Hill Hospital, 130 E 77th St, New York, NY 10075, USA, Tel.: +1 212 434 6776, Fax: +1 212 434 6781,
The IMPROVE Bleed Risk Assessment Model (RAM) effectively identifies high-risk patients for bleeding events in hospitals. This validation confirms its utility for personalized thromboprophylaxis strategies in medical patients.
Area of Science:
- Internal Medicine
- Clinical Risk Management
- Pharmacology
Background:
- The IMPROVE Bleed Risk Assessment Model (RAM) is the sole tool for assessing bleeding risk in hospitalized medical patients.
- It utilizes 11 clinical and laboratory factors to predict bleeding events.
Purpose of the Study:
- To externally validate the predictive accuracy of the IMPROVE Bleed RAM.
- To assess the model's ability to identify high-risk patients for bleeding events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective chart review of 12,082 hospitalized medical patients between October 2012 and July 2014.
- Application of the IMPROVE Bleed RAM scoring system to calculate risk scores.
- Dichotomization of patients into low-risk (<7) and high-risk (≥7) groups to compare bleeding rates.
Main Results:
- A total of 2.6% of patients experienced any bleed within 14 days of admission.
- High-risk patients (score ≥7) had significantly higher rates of any bleed (4.68%) and major bleeds (3.2%) compared to low-risk patients (2.12% and 1.5%, respectively).
- The Odds Ratio for any bleed was 2.3 and for major bleeds was 2.2 in the high-risk group, with p<0.0001 for both.
Conclusions:
- The IMPROVE Bleed RAM was successfully externally validated in a large cohort of hospitalized medical patients.
- A score of 7 or higher effectively identifies patients at increased risk for major and any bleeding events.
- The validated IMPROVE Bleed RAM can aid in tailoring thromboprophylaxis strategies for hospitalized medical patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)

