Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Sound Waves: Interference00:53

Sound Waves: Interference

5.0K
Sound waves can be modeled either as longitudinal waves, wherein the molecules of the medium oscillate around an equilibrium position, or as pressure waves. When two identical waves from the same source superimpose on each other, the combination of two crests or two troughs results in amplitude reinforcement known as constructive interference. If two identical waves, that are initially in phase, become out of phase because of different path lengths, the combination of crests with troughs...
5.0K
Interference: Path Lengths01:10

Interference: Path Lengths

2.4K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.4K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.8K
IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations01:08

IR Spectrum Peak Splitting: Symmetric vs Asymmetric Vibrations

2.1K
Identical bonds within a polyatomic group can stretch symmetrically (in-phase) or asymmetrically (out-of-phase). Similar to hydrogen bonding, these vibrations also influence the shape of the IR peak. Generally, asymmetric stretching frequencies are higher than symmetric stretching frequencies. For example, primary amines exhibit two distinct IR peaks between 3300–3500 cm−1 corresponding to the symmetric and asymmetric N-H stretching, while secondary amines exhibit a single...
2.1K
Beats01:09

Beats

1.6K
The study of music provides many examples of the superposition of waves and the constructive and destructive interference that occurs. Very few examples of music being performed consist of a single source playing a single frequency for an extended period of time. A single frequency of sound for an extended period might be monotonous to the point of irritation, similar to the unwanted drone of an aircraft engine or a loud fan. Music is pleasant and exciting due to mixing the changing frequencies...
1.6K
Determination of Expected Frequency01:08

Determination of Expected Frequency

2.7K
Suppose one wants to test independence between the two variables of a contingency table. The values in the table constitute the observed frequencies of the dataset. But how does one determine the expected frequency of the dataset? One of the important assumptions is that the two variables are independent, which means the variables do not influence each other. For independent variables, the statistical probability of any event involving both variables is calculated by multiplying the individual...
2.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spectral weighting of interaural time differences near the low-frequency dominant region in young and middle-aged adults.

JASA express letters·2026
Same author

Morphological details contribute to neuronal response variability within the same cell type.

Frontiers in cellular neuroscience·2026
Same author

Hyperpolarization-activated cation channels confer tonotopic specialization for temporal encoding of sound frequency in the cochlear nucleus.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Benefits of Enhanced Phase-Locking for Binaural Coding of Amplitude-Modulated Sounds.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same author

Persistent impairment of spatial hearing and neural binaural interaction after "temporary" noise-induced hearing loss.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Synaptic input variation enhances rate coding at the expense of temporal precision in cochlear nucleus neurons.

PLoS biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

11.3K

Roles for Coincidence Detection in Coding Amplitude-Modulated Sounds.

Go Ashida1, Jutta Kretzberg1, Daniel J Tollin2

  • 1Cluster of Excellence "Hearing4all", Department for Neuroscience, Faculty 6, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Plos Computational Biology
|June 21, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons use coincidence detection to process auditory information. Modeling reveals coincidence threshold and window critically shape responses to amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds and binaural phase differences.

More Related Videos

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

17.0K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 19, 2026

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans
08:25

Combined Invasive Subcortical and Non-invasive Surface Neurophysiological Recordings for the Assessment of Cognitive and Emotional Functions in Humans

Published on: May 19, 2016

11.3K
Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations
06:34

Infant Auditory Processing and Event-related Brain Oscillations

Published on: July 1, 2015

17.0K
Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach
10:50

Behavioral Determination of Stimulus Pair Discrimination of Auditory Acoustic and Electrical Stimuli Using a Classical Conditioning and Heart-rate Approach

Published on: June 6, 2012

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Auditory System Physiology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Sensory neurons encode temporal information via synaptic input coincidence detection.
  • Medial superior olive (MSO) neurons are known coincidence detectors.
  • The role of coincidence detection in lateral superior olive (LSO) neurons remains unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate mechanisms underlying temporal tuning in LSO neurons.
  • Examine how coincidence detection parameters influence monaural and binaural amplitude-modulated (AM) sound coding.
  • Understand sources of variability in LSO temporal tuning.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a simple coincidence counting model.
  • Examined effects of parameters like coincidence threshold, window width, and refractory period.
  • Simulated responses to monaural and binaural AM inputs and binaural phase differences.

Main Results:

  • Coincidence threshold significantly affected AM tuning curve shape and spike rates.
  • Coincidence window width primarily influenced output spike rates for AM sounds.
  • Temporal factors like coincidence window and inhibition duration were crucial for binaural phase coding.

Conclusions:

  • Coincidence detection of excitatory and inhibitory inputs is vital for LSO neurons.
  • Model successfully reproduced observed level-dependence in binaural phase coding.
  • Coincidence detection mechanisms explain LSO's role in encoding monaural and binaural AM sounds.