Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

2.7K
Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
2.7K
Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation01:25

Role of Communication in the Nursing Process II: Planning and Implementation

2.8K
Several factors are considered while creating a patient's care plan. Motivation is a factor in improving communication, and patients often require encouragement to try different approaches involving significant change. It is essential to involve the patient and family in decisions about the plan of care to determine whether the suggested methods are acceptable. Consider meeting critical comfort and safety needs before introducing new communication methods and techniques. Allow adequate time...
2.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.7K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.7K
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

7.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
7.1K
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

1.2K
Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
1.2K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

1.2K
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Gait asymmetry as a determinant of functional recovery and return to sport after ACL reconstruction: a cross-sectional biomechanical analysis.

Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology·2026
Same author

Evaluating Equity in AI-Supported Functional Assessment: Agreement Between Clinician Judgment and Digital Metrics in Stroke Rehabilitation.

Evaluation & the health professions·2026
Same author

Effect of early physical therapy initiation and adherence on functional outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective observational cohort study.

Frontiers in medicine·2026
Same author

Correction: Estimation of cervicocephalic kinesthetic perception and its correlation with fall risk in adults with diabetes and without diabetes experiencing cervical pain: A comparative study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Association between physical activity levels and functional recovery, quality of life, and psychological well-being in patients undergoing physiotherapy for musculoskeletal disorders: A cross-sectional study.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Core muscle endurance and psychosocial factors affecting functional mobility in chronic low back pain: cross-sectional results.

PeerJ·2025
Same journal

Sentience. Not Necessarily a Problem?

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

No Need to Feel.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The One Health Paradigm and Wild Animal Welfare Science.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

From Mollusks to Machines: An Ethical Framework Focused on the Urgency of Extreme Suffering.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

Sentience and Why It Matters.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
Same journal

The Wrong Motives for Potentially Harming a Being.

Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
08:16

Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

Published on: May 9, 2016

11.1K

Commentary: Surrogate Decisionmaking and Communication.

Debjani Mukherjee

    Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics : CQ : the International Journal of Healthcare Ethics Committees
    |June 28, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This case highlights challenges in surrogate decision-making when a patient cannot communicate preferences. It explores ethical conflicts between family and healthcare staff regarding prognosis communication and patient best interests.

    More Related Videos

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
    05:48

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

    Published on: June 12, 2020

    6.6K
    Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
    06:16

    Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: June 6, 2020

    4.7K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

    Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates
    08:16

    Preparation and Analysis of In Vitro Three Dimensional Breast Carcinoma Surrogates

    Published on: May 9, 2016

    11.1K
    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
    05:48

    The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

    Published on: June 12, 2020

    6.6K
    Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
    06:16

    Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

    Published on: June 6, 2020

    4.7K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Patient Advocacy

    Background:

    • Patient incapacity complicates medical decision-making.
    • Disagreements arise between surrogate decision-makers and healthcare providers.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine ethical considerations in surrogate decision-making for incapacitated patients.
    • To explore communication challenges regarding prognosis and patient best interests.

    Main Methods:

    • Case study analysis.
    • Ethical consultation process.

    Main Results:

    • Ethical conflicts emerge from differing interpretations of patient best interests.
    • Communication breakdowns exacerbate disagreements between family and staff.

    Conclusions:

    • Effective communication and ethical guidance are crucial for navigating surrogate decision-making.
    • Addressing staff angst and family expectations requires careful negotiation.