Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
Published on: February 2, 2017
[Failure to Attend Child Preventive Examination as a Possible Indication of Risk to Children's Welfare: Retrospective
1Kindervorsorgeuntersuchungen, Hessisches Kindervorsorgezentrum, Frankfurt am Main.
Insights
Failure to attend child preventive medical check-ups rarely indicates child welfare risk. Most missed appointments were resolved with explanations or further contact, suggesting improved communication could prevent many notifications.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Child Welfare Studies
- Public Health
Background:
- Child preventive examinations are crucial for monitoring child welfare.
- Non-attendance at these check-ups raises concerns about potential risks to children.
- The link between missed appointments and actual child welfare compromise requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the extent to which children's welfare is compromised by missed compulsory preventive medical check-ups.
- To investigate failure to attend child preventive examinations as a potential indicator of risk to child welfare.
- To analyze cases of non-attendance reported by the Hessen Prevention Center for Children.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 605 notifications of missed child preventive examinations from 2012.
- Standardized questionnaires for case recording.
- Interviews with Child Protection Services employees for cases escalated to General Social Services.
Main Results:
- 10% of check-ups were not certified, and 27% were late.
- 1.5% of families were previously known to Child Protection Services for welfare concerns.
- No new cases of child welfare risk were identified; 57% of notified cases were confirmed as attended within the recommended period.
- Common reasons for missed/late check-ups included travel, forgetting, illness, and lack of awareness.
Conclusions:
- Failure to attend child preventive examinations is not a reliable indicator of child welfare risk.
- Many notifications can be prevented through improved communication and upstream clearing procedures.
- Further investigation into the reasons for non-attendance can inform targeted interventions.
Abstract:
Objective: The extent to which childrens's welfare is compromised when they do not attend compulsory prevention medical check-ups is yet to be determined. Together with the Hessen Prevention Center for Children (Hessisches Kindervorsorgezentrum), the Child Protection Services in the Main-Taunus district have conducted a study to investigate failure to attend child preventive examinations as a possible indication of risk to the welfare of such children. Method: 605 notifications of child preventive examinations that were not carried out, sent in 2012 to the Child Protection Services by the Hessen Prevention Center for Children, were analyzed retrospectively. Each case was recorded using a standardized questionnaire and, cases that were passed on to General Social Services within Child Protection Services were investigated with an additional interview with the employee responsible. Results: In 60 (10%) cases there was no certificate to show that the check-up had been conducted, while in 165 (27%) cases the check-up was conducted late, i. e. only after being contacted by the Child Protection Services. In 9 of the 605 cases (1.5%), the families involved were already known to Child Protection Services due to previous proceedings against them under endangering children's welfare act (known as § 8a cases). No new case of a risk to children's welfare was detected. In 58 cases, families gave reasons for the missed or late check-up. Reasons included being abroad and moving house (20 cases), forgetting (14 cases) and illness (11 cases), as well as lack of knowledge of the law (6 cases), lack of health insurance (4 cases), lack of language skills (2 cases) and objection to the law in principle (1 case). It was notable that, in 57% of the cases notified, documentary evidence could be provided by the end of the case work that the check-up had taken place within the recommended period (including additional discretionary period). The majority of these notifications of failure to attend can be prevented by an upstream clearing procedure.
More Related Videos
19:15Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
14:05Behavioral Assessment of Hearing in 2 to 4 Year-old Children: A Two-interval, Observer-based Procedure Using Conditioned Play-based Responses
Published on: January 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Preventive Healthcare Services
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Conduct Disorder
Special considerations while measuring pulse
Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and...
Assessment of apical pulse
Assessing the apical pulse is a critical nursing procedure, particularly indicated for: