Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Chronic kidney disease and anaesthesia.

BJA education·2022
Same author

Synergistic Effect of Laminin and Epidermal Growth Factor on Biological and Morphological Properties of Co-Cultured Myoblasts and Fibroblasts.

Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine·2020
Same author

Multiple Synchronous Primary Carcinoma of the Colon.

The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery·2017
Same author

Influence of Pyridoxine on Fat Metabolism in Phrynoderma.

The Indian medical gazette·2017
Same author

IMPLANTS IN MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY.

Medical journal, Armed Forces India·2017
Same author

EFFICACY OF INDIGENOUSLY MANUFACTURED TITANIUM BONE PLATES AND SCREWS IN MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY.

Medical journal, Armed Forces India·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

12.0K

CLINICO-RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF XENOGRAFTS IN MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY.

S R Chowdhury1, B L Sapru2, P N Awasthi3

  • 1Graded Specialist (Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery), 15 Corps Dental Unit, C/o 56 APO.

Medical Journal, Armed Forces India
|July 2, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Researchers evaluated a processed xenograft (SURGIBONE) as a bone graft substitute for maxillofacial deformities. The study found it integrates well, showing promising results for reconstructive surgery.

Keywords:
Bone substituteSurgiboneXenograft

More Related Videos

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts
13:16

Computed Tomography and Optical Imaging of Osteogenesis-angiogenesis Coupling to Assess Integration of Cranial Bone Autografts and Allografts

Published on: December 22, 2015

12.0K
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

7.1K
Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
05:54

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla

Published on: October 18, 2021

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Regenerative Medicine

Background:

  • Autogenous bone grafts are the gold standard for maxillofacial reconstruction but have limitations.
  • The search for viable alternatives to autogenous bone grafts is ongoing.
  • Commercially processed xenografts offer potential as bone graft substitutes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of a commercially processed xenograft (SURGIBONE) as an alternative to autogenous bone grafts.
  • To assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of using SURGIBONE in maxillofacial surgical procedures.
  • To determine the host tissue response to the xenograft material.

Main Methods:

  • A clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed on 15 patients.
  • SURGIBONE was used as a bone graft substitute in various maxillofacial surgical procedures.
  • Follow-up assessments were conducted over a 12-18 month period.

Main Results:

  • Highly satisfactory clinical and radiographic results were observed.
  • Complete integration of the SURGIBONE graft was achieved in all patients.
  • No adverse host tissue reactions were reported during the follow-up period.

Conclusions:

  • Commercially processed xenograft (SURGIBONE) is a suitable substitute for autogenous bone grafts in maxillofacial surgery.
  • SURGIBONE demonstrates excellent integration and biocompatibility.
  • This xenograft offers a promising alternative for correcting maxillofacial deformities.