Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
Published on: April 11, 2018
Dosimetric evaluation of total marrow irradiation using 2 different planning systems
Adrian Nalichowski1, Don G Eagle2, Jay Burmeister3
1Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit, MI.
This study found that VOxel-Less Optimization (VoLO) system offers superior quality and efficiency for total marrow irradiation (TMI) plans compared to Eclipse. VoLO provides better organ sparing and faster plan creation for TMI.
Area of Science:
- Radiation Oncology
- Medical Physics
- Radiotherapy Planning
Background:
- Total marrow irradiation (TMI) is a complex radiotherapy technique requiring precise dose delivery.
- Evaluating and comparing different treatment planning systems (TPSs) is crucial for optimizing TMI quality and efficiency.
- Existing TPSs may have limitations in achieving optimal dose distribution and sparing organs at risk (OARs) during TMI.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the plan quality and efficiency of two TPSs: VOxel-Less Optimization (VoLO) and Eclipse.
- To assess the dosimetric outcomes, including target coverage and OAR sparing, for TMI plans generated by VoLO and Eclipse.
- To evaluate the computational time and beam-on time associated with each TPS for TMI planning.
Main Methods:
- Two TPSs, VoLO (helical dose delivery) and Eclipse (VMAT), were used to create TMI plans for an Alderson Rando phantom.
- A prescription dose of 1200cGy to cover 95% of the planning target volume (PTV) was used.
- Plans were evaluated based on PTV dose metrics, OAR doses (lungs, heart, liver, kidneys, brain, small bowel), optimization/calculation time, and beam-on time.
Main Results:
- Both TPSs generated acceptable TMI plans, but VoLO demonstrated superior OAR sparing for 5 out of 6 OARs, with reduced mean and D10 doses.
- VoLO achieved a more uniform dose distribution within the PTV and a steeper dose fall-off compared to Eclipse.
- Total computational time for VoLO (0.9 hours) was significantly faster than for Eclipse (3.8 hours), attributed to its GPU-based algorithm.
Conclusions:
- The VoLO planning system provides superior OAR sparing and more uniform dose distribution for TMI compared to Eclipse.
- VoLO's GPU-based optimization significantly reduces planning time, enhancing efficiency in TMI delivery.
- VoLO represents a promising advancement for high-quality and efficient total marrow irradiation planning.
More Related Videos
09:49A Whole Body Dosimetry Protocol for Peptide-Receptor Radionuclide Therapy PRRT: 2D Planar Image and Hybrid 2D+3D SPECT/CT Image Methods
Published on: April 24, 2020
08:54Treatment of Liver Metastases Using an Internal Target Volume Method for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
Published on: May 8, 2018