Results of a primary care-based quality improvement project to optimize chart-based vision screening for preschool

Jonathan R Modest1, Suzanne C Johnston2, Katherine M Majzoub3

  • 1Pediatric Physicians' Organization at Children's, Brookline, Massachusetts.

Insights

Implementing chart-based vision screening for preschoolers proved challenging, with success rates varying by age. While improving for 4- and 5-year-olds, it declined for 3-year-olds, highlighting age-related difficulties in pediatric vision screening.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatrics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Early detection of vision impairments in preschool children is crucial for development.
  • Chart-based vision screening is a common method, but its effectiveness in young children needs evaluation.
  • Quality improvement initiatives aim to enhance screening completion rates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design and evaluate a chart-based vision screening program for preschool-aged children.
  • To assess the feasibility and success of implementing vision screening at well-child visits.
  • To identify factors influencing the completion of comprehensive vision screening.

Main Methods:

  • A quality improvement project involving educational sessions for providers and training for practice staff.
  • Pre- and post-intervention review of medical records to assess screening completion.
  • Analysis of screening data for children aged 3, 4, and 5 years.

Main Results:

  • Full vision screening completion improved for 5-year-olds (45.0% to 58.2%) and 4-year-olds (39.3% to 51.4%).
  • Screening completion declined for 3-year-olds (23.1% to 14.3%).
  • Being 3 years old (RR 4.1) and attending a small practice (RR 1.9) were risk factors for incomplete screening.

Conclusions:

  • Chart-based vision screening for visual acuity and stereovision in preschool children is challenging.
  • Consistent success in screening preschool-aged children, particularly 3-year-olds, is unlikely with current chart-based methods.
  • Further improvements or alternative methods may be needed for effective pediatric vision screening.
Abstract