Living donor liver transplantation for biliary atresia - An Indian experience

Mohamed Safwan1, Priya Ramachandran1,2, Mettu Srinivas Reddy1

  • 1Institute of Liver Disease and Transplantation, Global Health City, Perumbakkam, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

Insights

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) offers excellent outcomes for children with biliary atresia (BA). Both primary LDLT and LDLT after Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) yield comparable results, with primary LDLT being more challenging due to younger patient age.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Surgery
  • Hepatology
  • Transplantation Immunology

Background:

  • Biliary atresia (BA) is a leading indication for pediatric liver transplantation (LT).
  • Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) has emerged as a viable option for improving outcomes in children with BA.
  • Evaluating institutional experience with LDLT for BA is crucial for refining surgical strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review a five-year experience of LDLT in children diagnosed with BA.
  • To assess the outcomes and complications associated with LDLT in this pediatric population.
  • To compare outcomes between primary LDLT and LDLT following Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE).

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of 132 pediatric LDLT cases from August 2010 to June 2015.
  • Selection of 58 patients with a primary diagnosis of BA.
  • Data extraction from a prospectively maintained database, case notes, and imaging studies; statistical analysis performed.

Main Results:

  • 58 children with BA underwent LDLT; 33 had prior KPE, 25 had primary LT.
  • Post-operative complications occurred in 34 children (13 minor, 21 major).
  • 30-day and 1-year survival rates were 96.6% and 91.4%, respectively. Age, weight, PELD, and GRWR differed significantly between primary LT and post-KPE groups.

Conclusions:

  • LDLT demonstrates excellent outcomes for children with BA.
  • Primary LDLT and LDLT after KPE achieve equivalent results.
  • Primary LDLT is technically more demanding due to the younger age of recipients.