Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 18, 2026

Online Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Protocol for Measuring Cortical Physiology Associated with Response Inhibition
Published on: February 8, 2018
N2 and P3 modulation during partial inhibition in a modified go/nogo task
An T Nguyen1, Jonson J Moyle2, Allison M Fox1
1School of Psychology, The University of Western Australia, Mailbag M304, 35 Stirling Highway Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Partial response inhibition involves distinct neural processes. An enhanced N2 component and absent central P3 suggest difficulties in complete response inhibition, highlighting the P3
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Neuroscience of Decision Making
Background:
- Understanding response inhibition is crucial for cognitive neuroscience.
- Neural markers like N2 and P3 offer insights into inhibitory control.
- Partial response inhibition, where a response is initiated but not completed, presents a unique challenge to inhibitory mechanisms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the neural correlates of successful and partial response inhibition.
- To differentiate the electrophysiological responses (N2 and P3 components) during different types of response inhibition.
Main Methods:
- Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in adults (N=24) during a go/nogo task.
- Analysis focused on correct go trials, successfully inhibited nogo trials, and partially inhibited nogo trials.
- Specific ERP components, N2 and P3, were examined for differences across trial types.
Main Results:
- An enhanced and delayed N2 component was observed in partially inhibited nogo trials compared to successfully inhibited trials, indicating an error-related process.
- A significant enhancement of the central P3 component was found following successful inhibitions compared to correct go trials.
- This central P3 enhancement was absent in partially inhibited nogo trials.
Conclusions:
- The central P3 enhancement is specific to complete and successful response inhibition.
- The absence of P3 in partial inhibition may reflect insufficient inhibitory control or a monitored failure to inhibit.
- Findings underscore the complexity of response inhibition and suggest further research into error correction mechanisms.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
13:20Online Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of Dorsomedial and Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex in Cognition Decision Making, and Cognitive Dissonance
Published on: December 5, 2025