Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

877
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
877
Interference and Decay01:16

Interference and Decay

565
Forgetting is a complex cognitive phenomenon influenced by several factors, among which interference and decay are particularly prominent. These processes explain why individuals often struggle to retrieve specific information from memory, leading to lapses in recall that can be observed in everyday situations.
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
565

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Out of sight, out of mind? How discarded items shape environmental judgments.

Cognitive research: principles and implications·2026
Same author

Serial recall in spatial acoustic environments: irrelevant sound effect and spatial source alternations.

Scientific reports·2025
Same author

The impact of forensic delay: facilitating facial composite construction using an early-recall retrieval technique.

Ergonomics·2025
Same author

It would feel weird to not drive my car! Exploring the role of habits in public policy acceptance of carbon taxations.

Ambio·2024
Same author

When softer sounds are more distracting: Task-irrelevant whispered speech causes disruption of serial recall.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024
Same author

Auditory distraction during reading: Investigating the effects of background sounds on parafoveal processing.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K

Distraction of Mental Arithmetic by Background Speech.

Nick Perham1, John E Marsh2,3, Martin Clarkson1

  • 11 Department of Applied Psychology, Cardiff Metropolitan University, UK.

Experimental Psychology
|July 13, 2016
PubMed
Summary

Background speech, especially numbers, disrupts mental arithmetic. Ascending numbers caused the most significant performance decline, suggesting a conflict in cognitive processing.

Keywords:
Habitual responsesIrrelevant soundMental arithmeticPriming

More Related Videos

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

30.4K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2026

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions
10:38

A Cognitive Paradigm to Investigate Interference in Working Memory by Distractions and Interruptions

Published on: July 16, 2015

14.2K
Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum
11:47

Modulating Cognition Using Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Cerebellum

Published on: February 15, 2015

30.4K
Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition
16:08

Brain Imaging Investigation of the Impairing Effect of Emotion on Cognition

Published on: February 1, 2012

16.9K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Auditory Distraction Studies
  • Numerical Cognition

Background:

  • Auditory distractions, particularly speech, impair cognitive tasks.
  • Numerical speech poses a greater disruption than non-numerical speech.
  • Understanding the cognitive mechanisms behind auditory interference is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of ascending and descending numerical speech on mental arithmetic performance.
  • To explore the underlying cognitive processes contributing to auditory distraction during numerical tasks.
  • To compare the disruptive effects of different numerical speech patterns.

Main Methods:

  • Participants solved mental addition problems under three conditions: quiet, ascending numerical speech, and descending numerical speech.
  • Performance metrics included accuracy and response time.
  • The study design aimed to isolate the effects of numerical sequence direction.

Main Results:

  • Mental arithmetic performance was significantly impaired by background numerical speech compared to quiet conditions.
  • Performance was poorest in the ascending numbers condition, followed by the descending numbers condition.
  • Accuracy was highest in the quiet condition, demonstrating a clear disruptive effect of auditory numerical stimuli.

Conclusions:

  • The findings suggest that auditory numerical stimuli interfere with mental arithmetic by disrupting cognitive control mechanisms.
  • The direction of numerical sequence (ascending vs. descending) influences the degree of disruption.
  • Preventing inaccurate, primed responses from taking control may be a key factor in the observed interference.