A comparison of amplitude-modulated and frequency-modulated ambulatory monitoring systems

To compare the results of monitoring for ischemia with amplitude-modulated (AM) and frequency-modulated (FM) ambulatory recorders, 22 patients with coronary artery disease were monitored during exercise and during 24 to 48 hours of daily activities. Simultaneous recordings were obtained with Oxford Medilog 4000-II and Medilog MR-35 systems from the same 2 bipolar leads. Each potential ischemic episode was interpreted blindly by 2 investigators. Significant ST depression was strictly defined as greater than or equal to 1 mm of horizontal or down-sloping ST depression persisting for 0.06 second beyond the J point and lasting greater than or equal to 1 minute. Of 82 episodes reviewed, 63 (77%) were either positive (37) or negative (26) for ischemia by both systems. However, 17 episodes were interpreted as positive on AM tracings but negative on FM tracings; the converse was true for only 2 episodes (p less than 0.01). For episodes read as positive with both systems, there were close correlations between recorders for duration (r = 0.80) and magnitude (r = 0.90) of ST depression. Because of the greater number of positive AM events, however, the mean total duration of ST depression for patients with ischemia during daily activities was greater on AM than on FM recordings (74 +/- 77 vs 39 +/- 42 minutes, p less than 0.10). Discrepancies between AM and FM tracings were invariably due to small differences in ST-segment morphology or in the magnitude of ST-segment depression. In summary, AM monitors generate complexes similar in appearance to those produced by FM devices in most instances.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)