A comparison of plusoptiX A12 measurements with cycloplegic refraction

Miri Fogel-Levin1, Ravid Doron1, Tamara Wygnanski-Jaffe1

  • 1Goldschleger Eye Institute, Sheba Medical Center, and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Insights

The plusoptiX A12 device accurately detects amblyogenic risk factors in children, showing high reliability for myopia and astigmatism. However, its accuracy is lower for hyperopic refractive errors.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Pediatric Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science

Background:

  • Amblyogenic risk factors in children require early detection for effective intervention.
  • The plusoptiX A12 is a handheld autorefractor designed for pediatric vision screening.
  • Accurate refractive error assessment is crucial for preventing amblyopia.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the plusoptiX A12 device in identifying amblyogenic risk factors in children.
  • To compare plusoptiX A12 screening results with cycloplegic refraction and complete ophthalmic examinations.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective data collection from children undergoing plusoptiX A12 screening and cycloplegic refraction.
  • Utilized American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus (AAPOS) 2013 guidelines for screening criteria.
  • Analyzed refractive data (sphere, cylinder, axis, spherical equivalent) from 402 eyes of 201 children.

Main Results:

  • Strong correlations were found between plusoptiX A12 and cycloplegic refraction for sphere (r=0.91), cylinder (r=0.81), and axis (r=0.7).
  • High sensitivity and specificity were observed for myopia (86%, 93%) and astigmatism (85%, 98%).
  • Lower reliability was noted for hyperopic refractive errors (sensitivity 40%, specificity 100%).

Conclusions:

  • The plusoptiX A12 demonstrates high accuracy in detecting amblyogenic risk factors across various refractive error subgroups.
  • The device is particularly accurate for myopic and astigmatic children.
  • Reduced reliability in hyperopic eyes may lead to underestimation of hyperopic refractive error, warranting further investigation.
Abstract