Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimization Problems01:26

Optimization Problems

124
Optimization problems often involve identifying maximum or minimum values under specific constraints. A well-known example is determining the longest horizontal pipe that can be moved around a right-angled corner, where a 3-meter-wide hallway meets a 2-meter-wide hallway. This scenario, common in architectural design and industrial transport, can be understood conceptually through geometric and trigonometric reasoning.To visualize the problem, consider the pipe as a straight line that touches...
124
Introduction to Scalers01:21

Introduction to Scalers

2.7K
2.7K
Trial and Error and Algorithm01:12

Trial and Error and Algorithm

473
A problem-solving strategy is a plan of action used to find a solution. Different strategies have distinct action plans. Trial and error involves trying different solutions until one works. For instance, to fix a broken printer, you might check ink levels, ensure the paper tray isn't jammed, and verify the printer's connection to your laptop. This method can be time-consuming but is commonly used. Thomas Edison, for example, used trial and error to find a suitable filament for the light...
473
Case Studies01:22

Case Studies

13.8K
There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.
13.8K
Optimizing Chromatographic Separations01:15

Optimizing Chromatographic Separations

1.1K
Optimizing chromatographic separations is crucial for obtaining clean separations in a minimum amount of time. Optimization is required for several factors, including kinetic effects related to band broadening, plate height, capacity factor, and separation factor.
Band broadening refers to spreading solute bands as they travel through the column. This broadening can impact resolution. Plate height (H) represents the length required for one theoretical plate. A lower plate height corresponds to...
1.1K
Compacting Factor test01:22

Compacting Factor test

676
The compacting factor test is a method used to assess the workability of concrete. It is  especially suitable for concrete mixes containing aggregates up to one and a half inches in size. This test involves specialized equipment consisting of two truncated cone-shaped hoppers and a cylinder, all with polished interior surfaces to minimize friction.
The procedure begins by placing concrete into the upper hopper without any compaction. Once filled, the bottom door of this hopper is opened,...
676

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early experience with automated B-mode quality assurance tests.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2016
Same author

Guideline for Technical Quality Assurance (TQA) of ultrasound devices (B-Mode)--version 1.0 (July 2012): EFSUMB Technical Quality Assurance Group--US-TQA/B.

Ultraschall in der Medizin (Stuttgart, Germany : 1980)·2012
Same author

Assessing the consistency of bladder filling using an ultrasonic Bladderscan device.

The British journal of radiology·2012
Same author

Immobilization of mycotoxins on modified nanodiamond substrates.

Biointerphases·2012
Same author

Atrial fibrillation: will new drugs and patient choice improve anticoagulation outcomes?

Heart (British Cardiac Society)·2005
Same author

A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2004
Same journal

Sonographic evaluation of low-lying gestational sac in the first trimester: A sonographer's guide to identify caesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2026
Same journal

Point-of-care ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian torsion in prepubescent girls: A mini-case series.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2026
Same journal

Diet, physical activity, and body mass index on gallbladder recovery time: An exploratory ultrasound pilot study.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2026
Same journal

Factors influencing the successful acquisition and quality of three-dimensional souvenir obstetric ultrasound facial images: A narrative review and quantitative evaluation.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic value of cystic artery colour Doppler ultrasound indices in acute cholecystitis.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2026
Same journal

AFMD Master: An open-source software for automated extraction of artery flow-mediated dilation from vascular ultrasound videos with validation against manual analysis.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.6K

A case study in scanner optimisation.

N J Dudley1, N M Gibson2

  • 1Medical Physics Department, United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust, Lincoln, UK.

Ultrasound (Leeds, England)
|July 20, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ultrasound scanner presets vary significantly, impacting image quality. Adjusting settings with quality assurance software can match performance, ensuring consistent breast ultrasound imaging across devices.

Keywords:
Ultrasoundoptimisation

More Related Videos

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

3.9K
Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques
07:52

Author Spotlight: Enhancing Cryo-Electron Microscopy by Automated Data Collection and Analysis Techniques

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.6K
NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode
09:19

NMR-Based Fragment Screening in a Minimum Sample but Maximum Automation Mode

Published on: June 4, 2021

3.9K
Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box
14:23

Design and Optimization Strategies of a High-Performance Vented Box

Published on: June 9, 2023

1.7K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Diagnostic Ultrasound
  • Quality Assurance in Healthcare

Background:

  • Ultrasound scanner preset programs can be factory-set or user-defined, leading to performance variations.
  • Even similar ultrasound equipment within a single department may exhibit different settings for the same application.
  • Variability in ultrasound presets can affect diagnostic image quality and consistency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To match the performance of two ultrasound scanners, one of which was preferred.
  • To evaluate performance differences among six breast ultrasound scanners within an organization.
  • To determine if ultrasound scanner performance can be harmonized through standardized settings.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Nottingham Ultrasound Quality Assurance software for comparative imaging analysis.
  • Acquired images of a Gammex RMI 404GS test object from six scanners.
  • Measured resolution, low contrast, and high contrast performance using default, factory, and matched presets.

Main Results:

  • Successfully matched the performance of two previously differing ultrasound scanners.
  • Observed significant variations in default and commonly used presets across scanners, particularly in frequency modes.
  • Factory presets showed more consistency, with dynamic range being the primary differentiator.
  • Adjusting settings to match a reference scanner significantly reduced or eliminated observed image quality differences.

Conclusions:

  • Ultrasound scanner performance can be successfully matched using quality assurance software as a verification tool.
  • Users must recognize that seemingly equivalent presets can yield dissimilar scanner behaviors.
  • Harmonizing ultrasound presets through consensus among users is achievable and recommended for consistent imaging.