Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026
Utility of Dissociated Intrinsic Hand Muscle Atrophy in the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Published on: March 4, 2014
Diagnostic criteria in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A multicenter prospective study
Nimeshan Geevasinga1, Parvathi Menon1, Daniel B Scherman1
1From Westmead Clinical School (N.G., P.M., D.B.S., S.V.), Brain and Mind Center (M.C.K.), Royal North Shore Hospital (C.Y.), University of Sydney; St Vincent's Clinical School (N.S.), University of New South Wales; and Department of Neurology (R.D.H.), Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Queensland, Australia.
The Awaji criteria demonstrate higher sensitivity for diagnosing amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) compared to revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC), with identical specificity. Including possible cases improves sensitivity for both diagnostic standards in ALS.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Diagnostic Accuracy
- Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Background:
- Accurate diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is crucial for patient management and clinical trials.
- Existing diagnostic criteria, such as the revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC), have limitations in sensitivity.
- The Awaji criteria represent a newer set of diagnostic guidelines for ALS.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the Awaji criteria versus the revised El Escorial criteria (rEEC) for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).
- To evaluate the diagnostic performance of these criteria across different ALS subtypes and disease stages.
Main Methods:
- A prospective, multicenter study involving 416 patients diagnosed with ALS between 2012 and 2015.
- Comparison of diagnostic accuracy metrics (sensitivity, specificity) between Awaji and rEEC criteria.
- Subgroup analysis based on disease onset (bulbar, limb) and inclusion of 'possible' diagnostic category.
Main Results:
- Awaji criteria exhibited significantly higher sensitivity (57%) than rEEC (45%) for ALS diagnosis (p < 0.001).
- Both criteria demonstrated identical high specificity (99.5%).
- Higher sensitivity for Awaji criteria was observed in both bulbar-onset and limb-onset ALS subgroups.
- Including the 'possible' diagnostic category as a positive finding increased sensitivity for both criteria while maintaining specificity, especially in early-stage ALS.
Conclusions:
- The Awaji criteria offer superior sensitivity compared to rEEC for diagnosing ALS, with comparable specificity.
- The diagnostic benefits of Awaji criteria are evident in both bulbar and limb-onset ALS.
- Incorporating the 'possible' diagnostic category enhances sensitivity for both criteria and should be considered in clinical practice and future ALS research.
