Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Instrument reliability and validity: how much needs to be published?

M R Lynn1

  • 1University of Arizona College of Nursing, Tucson 85721.

Heart & Lung : the Journal of Critical Care
|July 1, 1989
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Implementation of the ANA report card.

The Journal of nursing administration·1999
Same author

Do nurses know what patients think is important in nursing care?

Journal of nursing care quality·1999
Same author

The final chapter in the nursing administration research priorities saga: the state of the state.

The Journal of nursing administration·1999
Same author

Nursing administration research priorities. A national Delphi study.

The Journal of nursing administration·1998
Same author

Relationship between traditional quality indicators and perceptions of care.

Seminars for nurse managers·1998
Same author

Research utilization by nurse managers: current practices and future directions.

Seminars for nurse managers·1998
Same journal

Diagnosing heart failure through imaging.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Comparative utility of median household income, social vulnerability index, and social deprivation index in predicting heart failure-related emergency department revisits: A multi-hospital cohort study.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Predicting in-hospital mortality in AECOPD: A comparison of the mSOFA score with DECAF, Ottawa, and GOLD classifications.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and biomarkers for hypersensitivity pneumonitis: A systematic review.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Associations of genetic risk factors and air pollution with incident pulmonary embolism: a prospective cohort study in the UK Biobank.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
Same journal

Impaired hemostasis in mechanical circulatory support systems: Monitoring with T-TAS® 01, in vitro correction with VWF concentrates, and impact of membrane oxygenators.

Heart & lung : the journal of critical care·2026
See all related articles

Research findings are only as good as the instruments used. Ensure instruments have clear descriptions, reliability, and validity data for credible results.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research methodology
  • Biomedical instrumentation

Background:

  • Many studies, even sophisticated ones, suffer from poor instrumentation.
  • Lack of detailed instrumentation information undermines research credibility.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To emphasize the critical role of instrumentation quality in research.
  • To advocate for comprehensive reporting of instrumentation in scientific publications.

Main Methods:

  • Review of 20 studies from Heart & Lung.
  • Analysis of instrumentation reporting standards.

Main Results:

  • Instrumentation quality is a limiting factor in research findings.
  • Inadequate instrumentation descriptions (descriptive, reliability, validity) reduce data merit.

Related Experiment Videos

Conclusions:

  • Research results require detailed instrumentation information for validation.
  • Researchers must provide comprehensive instrumentation data; consumers should demand it.