Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Next-generation Sequencing

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features....

Mismatch Repair

Mismatch Repair

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Mitochondrial-endoplasmic reticulum interactions in lung diseases.

Cell death & disease·2026

Same author

Author Correction: TGF-β promotes pericyte-myofibroblast transition in subretinal fibrosis through the Smad2/3 and Akt/mTOR pathways.

Experimental & molecular medicine·2026

Same author

Mesoscopic Approach for Disjoining Pressure Effects in Nanoscale Thin Liquid Films on Nanostructured Surfaces.

Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids·2026

Same author

Research advances in claudin-1 in the eye.

Experimental eye research·2026

Same author

Helicobacter pylori promotes gastric cancer progression through the GATA3-AS1/miR-30c-5p/CTHRC1 axis.

International immunopharmacology·2026

Same author

GenoBERT: A Language Model for Accurate Genotype Imputation.

ArXiv·2026

Same journal

Mutational spectrum of SLC26A4 and SLC26A5 associated with hereditary hearing loss in Moroccan families.

Human genomics·2026

Same journal

National genomic projects in Asia and Africa: a review.

Human genomics·2026

Same journal

Analysis of whole-exome sequencing data from nearly 10,000 Iranian individuals: identification of recessive mitochondrial disease variants and proposal of a population-specific carrier screening panel.

Human genomics·2026

Same journal

Replicating lipid micelles: a feasible precursor to the origin of life and the earliest appearance of genomes.

Human genomics·2026

Same journal

Beckwith-Wiedemann spectrum exhibiting a 46,XY karyotype caused by genome-wide paternal uniparental heterodisomy: a case report.

Human genomics·2026

Same journal

Dynamic responses in the human methylome to exertional heat exhaustion, heat injury, and heat stroke.

Human genomics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

A comparative study of k-spectrum-based error correction methods for next-generation sequencing data analysis.

Isaac Akogwu¹, Nan Wang¹, Chaoyang Zhang¹

¹School of Computing, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, 39406, USA.

|July 28, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study evaluated k-spectrum-based methods for correcting next-generation sequencing (NGS) errors. Musket demonstrated the best performance across various datasets, making it the recommended choice for NGS data error correction.

Keywords:

Bloom filter Error correction Next-generation sequencing (NGS)Sequence analysis k-mer k-spectrum

More Related Videos

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Published on: March 31, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Rare Event Detection Using Error-corrected DNA and RNA Sequencing

Published on: August 3, 2018

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Detection of Rare Mutations in CtDNA Using Next Generation Sequencing

Published on: August 24, 2017

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Using Next Generation Sequencing to Identify Mutations Associated with Repair of a CAS9-induced Double Strand Break Near the CD4 Promoter

Published on: March 31, 2022

Area of Science:

Genomics
Bioinformatics
Computational Biology

Background:

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) generates vast amounts of data, presenting challenges in distinguishing true biological variants from sequencing errors.
Existing error correction methods lack independent evaluation regarding their performance on datasets with varying read lengths, genome sizes, and coverage depths.

Purpose of the Study:

To comparatively evaluate the performance of several k-spectrum-based error correction methods for NGS data.
To investigate the impact of dataset features (read length, genome size, coverage depth) on method performance.
To provide recommendations for selecting appropriate error correction tools for specific NGS datasets.

Main Methods:

Six k-spectrum-based methods (Reptile, Musket, Bless, Bloocoo, Lighter, Trowel) were tested.
Simulated paired-end Illumina sequencing data with varying coverage (10×-120×), read length (36-100 bp), and genome size (4.6-143 MB) were used.
The Error Correction Evaluation Toolkit (ECET) assessed performance using metrics like true positives, false positives, recall, precision, and F-score.

Main Results:

Musket exhibited the best overall performance, achieving an F-score of 0.81 even on a challenging dataset.
Other methods underperformed (F-score < 0.80) or failed to process certain datasets.
Performance varied based on dataset characteristics like read length, coverage, and genome size.

Conclusions:

Dataset features significantly influence the performance of k-spectrum-based error correction methods.
Musket is recommended as the top choice due to its consistent superior performance.
Further studies are needed to evaluate methods on experimental data and compare them with non-k-spectrum approaches.