Idarubicin plus Cytarabine versus Doxorubicin plus Cytarabine in Induction Therapy for Acute Non- Lymphoid Leukaemia:...

A randomized trial comparing idarubicin plus cytarabine (IDA/Ara-C) with doxorubicin plus cytarabine (ADM/Ara-C) in induction therapy for ANL,L was carried out. The IDA/Ara-C regimen consisted of idarubicin 20 mg/m(2) p.o. given on days 1, 2 and 3 plus cytarabine 25 mg/m(2) as a loading dose followed by 100 mg/m(2) by continuous infusion daily × 7 days. The ADM/Ara-C regimen consisted of adriamycin 30 mg/m(2) on days 1, 2 and 3 and the same dose of cytarabine. Patients who responded to the first cycle with at least 502, reduction of marrow blasts received a second treatment cycle followed by a consolidation cycle of the same treatment for those in CR at the end of 2 cycles. 35/52 (6770 receiving ADM/Ara-C achieved CR, with 25 (48%) patients in CR after a single treatment cycle. 28/48 (58%) receiving ADM/Ara-C achieved CR of whom 11 (23%) went into remission after the first treatment cycle. IDA/Ara-C caused less nausea and vomiting, less stomatitis, a shorter duration of neutropenia and less need for platelet support than ADM/Ara-C. The median duration of CR is 62 weeks for IDA/Ara-C and 48 weeks for ADM/Ara.-C. These differences are not statistically significant. Clinical cardiotoxicity occurred in 4/48 patients treated with ADM/Ara-C. No clinical cardiac toxicity was observed in those receiving IDA/Ara-C. The mean post-treatment ejection fraction was, in addition, lower for ADM/Ara-C than for IDA/Ara-C. It is concluded that IDA/Ara-C is an effective and safe induction therapy for ANLL.