Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026
08:03
Midface Hypoplasia and Cranial Base Morphology in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: A Comparative Analysis Study Using a Predictive Regression Model
Published on: November 4, 2025
365
Filler Rhinoplasty Evaluated by Anthropometric Analysis.
1*Modelo Dermatology Clinic, Seoul, Korea; †Department of Dermatology, Seoul National University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Summary
Filler rhinoplasty effectively reshapes the nose using anthropometric analysis. Key measurements like nasal radix height and nasolabial angle (NLA) demonstrate significant improvements, offering a simple alternative to surgical rhinoplasty.
Area of Science:
- Plastic Surgery
- Aesthetic Medicine
- Facial Analysis
Background:
- Objective evaluation of filler rhinoplasty efficacy using anthropometric techniques is lacking.
- Hyaluronic acid fillers are commonly used for rhinoplasty.
Purpose of the Study:
- To objectively assess the effectiveness of filler rhinoplasty through anthropometric analysis.
- To establish reliable anthropometric markers for evaluating filler rhinoplasty outcomes.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 242 patients undergoing hyaluronic acid filler rhinoplasty.
- Data collection on injection site, volume, and anthropometric changes.
- Measurement of radix height, nasofrontal angle, nasolabial angle (NLA), and modified nasofacial angle.
Main Results:
- Nasal radix height, nasofrontal angle, and NLA showed significant increases.
- Modified nasofacial angle decreased, indicating improved facial harmony.
- Vascular complications were rare (1.2%).
Conclusions:
- Filler rhinoplasty is a safe and effective procedure with outcomes comparable to surgical rhinoplasty.
- Nasal radix height is optimal for evaluating dorsum augmentation.
- Nasolabial angle (NLA) is the best indicator for nasal tip rotation outcomes.
