Related Experiment Videos
In vitro degradation of cements: a comparison of three test methods
M L Swartz1, R W Phillips, C Pareja
1Indiana University, School of Dentistry, Indianapolis.
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
|July 1, 1989
Summary
This study assessed in vitro tests for predicting luting cement disintegration. The best predictor of oral cavity disintegration was a size reduction test using 0.01 M acetic acid.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Biomaterials Engineering
- Oral Health Research
Background:
- Luting cements are crucial for dental restorations, but their long-term stability in the oral environment is a concern.
- Predicting the disintegration rate of luting cements in vivo is essential for clinical success.
- Standardized in vitro testing methods are needed to accurately forecast cement performance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate three in vitro tests for their efficacy in predicting the disintegration resistance of luting cements.
- To compare the results of in vitro tests with in vivo disintegration rates.
- To identify the optimal in vitro test and storage medium for assessing cement stability.
Main Methods:
- Three in vitro tests were employed: weight loss, size reduction of cement films between glass flats, and transverse strength reduction.
- Cements were stored in distilled water (H2O) and varying concentrations of acetic acid (HAc): 0.1 M, 0.01 M, and 0.001 M.
- In vitro data were correlated with previously measured in vivo disintegration rates.
Main Results:
- Test No. 2, measuring the reduction in size of cement films, showed the highest correlation with in vivo disintegration.
- The optimal storage medium for Test No. 2 was found to be 0.01 M acetic acid.
- Other tested conditions (weight loss, transverse strength, different media) demonstrated lower predictive accuracy.
Conclusions:
- A specific in vitro test (size reduction between glass flats) in a defined acidic medium (0.01 M HAc) can effectively predict luting cement disintegration in the oral cavity.
- This method offers a reliable alternative for assessing cement durability compared to other in vitro approaches.
- Further validation may enhance its clinical applicability in dental material selection.