Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

To boldly go where no text has gone before: The effects of boldface letters on eye movements in reading.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Music reading expertise affects visual change detection: Evidence from a music-related flicker paradigm.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2021
Same author

Recognition of transposed melodies: Effects of pitch distance and harmonic distance.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2017
Same author

Dissociative effects of phonological vs. semantic associates on recognition memory in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott paradigm.

Acta psychologica·2011
Same author

Does subliminal priming of free response choices depend on task set or automatic response activation?

Consciousness and cognition·2010
Same author

Is unconscious identity priming lexical or sublexical?

Consciousness and cognition·2004

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K

Spatial negative priming: Location or response?

W Trammell Neill1, Abigail L Kleinsmith2

  • 1Department of Psychology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, 12222, USA. wneill@albany.edu.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 29, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Spatial negative priming (SNP) slows responses to recently occupied locations. This study found SNP is location-specific, not response-specific, even when locations map to different responses.

Keywords:
Inhibition of returnNegative primingSpatial attention

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

10.4K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.1K
The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition
05:15

The Spatial Memory Game: Testing the Relationship Between Spatial Language, Object Knowledge, and Spatial Cognition

Published on: February 19, 2018

11.4K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Perception and Performance
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Spatial negative priming (SNP) describes slower responses to stimuli at previously occupied locations.
  • Previous studies often used a one-to-one mapping between stimulus locations and responses, creating ambiguity.
  • This ambiguity questioned whether SNP reflects location-specific delays or response inhibition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To disambiguate the locus of spatial negative priming (SNP).
  • To determine if SNP is driven by location-specific processing or response inhibition.
  • To investigate the role of response-location mapping in SNP.

Main Methods:

  • Participants performed a task requiring key presses based on the ordinal position of a target stimulus ('O').
  • A distractor stimulus ('X') appeared in a different location.
  • Stimulus display spacing was manipulated (wide/narrow) to create overlapping location-response mappings, dissociating location from response.

Main Results:

  • Spatial negative priming (SNP) was observed when targets appeared in recently occupied distractor locations.
  • This effect persisted regardless of whether the response was associated with the distractor's location.
  • No SNP occurred when a target shared a response with a distractor but was in a different location.

Conclusions:

  • The findings strongly support a location-specific locus for spatial negative priming (SNP).
  • Spatial negative priming is not primarily driven by response inhibition.
  • Location, not the motor response, is the critical factor in SNP.