Level variations in speech: Effect on masking release in hearing-impaired listeners
Charlotte M Reed1, Joseph G Desloge1, Louis D Braida1
1Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 1, 2016
Summary
Reducing amplitude variations in speech signals can significantly improve speech understanding for individuals with hearing impairments, especially in noisy environments. This processing enhances masking release and consonant identification.
Area of Science:
- Auditory Neuroscience
- Speech Processing
- Hearing Impairment Research
Background:
- Acoustic speech features time-varying amplitude envelopes, which can impede speech comprehension for hearing-impaired individuals.
- Previous research suggests temporal fine-structure (TFS) processing may improve speech reception in noise.
- Minimizing amplitude variations could be a key factor in enhancing speech intelligibility.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the impact of reduced amplitude variations on speech masking release in hearing-impaired listeners.
- To compare the effectiveness of different speech processing techniques (peak clipping, TFS processing) with minimal level variations.
- To determine if decreased stimulus level variations improve consonant identification in noise.
Main Methods:
- Measured consonant identification for hearing-impaired listeners in continuous and fluctuating speech-shaped noise.
- Utilized speech processed to minimize amplitude variations, including peak clipping and TFS processing of envelope signals.
- Quantified normalized masking release for different speech processing conditions.
Main Results:
- Speech processed to have minimal level variations yielded substantially greater normalized masking release compared to speech with normal variations.
- Consonant identification performance was positively correlated with the reduction in stimulus level variations.
- The findings align with previous observations on the benefits of TFS processing.
Conclusions:
- Signal processing techniques that reduce stimulus level variations can significantly improve speech perception for hearing-impaired listeners in fluctuating noise.
- Minimizing amplitude envelope fluctuations is a promising strategy for enhancing speech intelligibility in challenging listening conditions.
- Further research into amplitude normalization techniques could lead to improved assistive listening devices.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Sound Intensity Level
5.0K
Humans perceive sound by hearing. The human ear helps sound waves reach the brain, which then interprets the waves and creates the perception of hearing. The loudness of the environment in which a person is located determines whether they can distinguish between different sound sources.
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
The human ear can perceive an extensive range of sound intensity, necessitating the use of the logarithmic scale to define a physical quantity—the intensity level. It is a ratio of two intensities and...
5.0K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location
1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Hearing
58.4K
When we hear a sound, our nervous system is detecting sound waves—pressure waves of mechanical energy traveling through a medium. The frequency of the wave is perceived as pitch, while the amplitude is perceived as loudness.
58.4K
Interference: Path Lengths
2.4K
Consider two sources of sound, that may or may not be in phase, emitting waves at a single frequency, and consider the frequencies to be the same.
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
Two special sources may be considered when they are in phase. This can be easily achieved by feeding the two sources from the same source. An example would be synchronizing the two speakers by feeding them with the same source, such as the sound waves produced by a tuning fork. This setup ensures that the two sources have the same frequency and are...
2.4K
Perception of Sound Waves
5.9K
The human ear is not equally sensitive to all frequencies in the audible range. It may perceive sound waves with the same pressure but different frequencies as having different loudness. Moreover, the perception of sound waves depends on the health of an individual's ears, which decays with age. The health of one's ears may also be affected by regular exposure to loud noises.
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
5.9K


