Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Echo01:06

Echo

1.1K
The human ear cannot distinguish between two sources of sound if they happen to reach within a specific time interval, typically 0.1 seconds apart. More than this, and they are perceived as separate sources.
Imagine the sound is reflected back to the ears. Assuming that the source is very close to the human, the difference between hearing the two sounds—the emitted sound and the reflected sound—may be more than the minimum time for perceiving distinct sounds. If this is the case,...
1.1K
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

1.3K
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
1.3K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.8K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Synchronizing Automatic Gain Control in Bilateral Cochlear Implants Mitigates Dynamic Localization Deficits Introduced by Independent Bilateral Compression.

Ear and hearing·2024
Same author

Cones-of-Confusions: Are listeners confused? (L).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Randomizing spectral cues used to resolve front-back reversals in sound-source localization.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2023
Same author

Molecular analysis of individual differences in talker search at the cocktail-party.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2022
Same author

Spatial Release from Masking for Tones and Noises in a Soundfield under Conditions Where Targets and Maskers Are Stationary or Moving.

Audiology research·2022
Same author

Do I have a hearing loss?

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2021
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

958

Sound source localization identification accuracy: Level and duration dependencies.

William A Yost1

  • 1Speech and Hearing Science, Arizona State University, PO Box 870102, Tempe, Arizona 85287, USA William.yost@asu.edu.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|August 1, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sound localization accuracy for noises was determined by stimulus bandwidth and center frequency, not noise level or duration. This research aids in understanding auditory perception and spatial hearing capabilities.

More Related Videos

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

957
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 17, 2026

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention
04:32

Sound Source Localization Testing in Single-sided Deafness Following Bone Conduction Intervention

Published on: December 20, 2024

958
Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
09:09

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody

Published on: September 27, 2024

957
Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Human Perception

Background:

  • Accurate sound source localization is crucial for auditory scene analysis and spatial awareness.
  • Previous research has explored various factors influencing sound localization, but the interplay of noise characteristics requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of noise bandwidth and center frequency on sound source localization accuracy.
  • To determine if overall noise level and duration affect the ability to localize sound sources.

Main Methods:

  • Listeners performed an auditory identification task, identifying which loudspeaker emitted a sound.
  • Noise stimuli were presented in an open-field setup and varied in bandwidth and center frequency.
  • Sound source localization accuracy was measured as a function of these acoustic parameters.

Main Results:

  • Localization accuracy was significantly influenced by the bandwidth of the noise stimuli.
  • For narrow bandwidth noises, the center frequency of the filter also played a critical role in accuracy.
  • Neither the overall noise level nor the duration of the sound stimuli affected localization accuracy.

Conclusions:

  • Auditory localization performance is primarily determined by the spectral characteristics (bandwidth and center frequency) of the sound, rather than its intensity or temporal extent.
  • These findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the acoustic cues used in spatial hearing.
  • The results have implications for designing auditory displays and understanding hearing impairments.