Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 17, 2026

11:51
Combining Behavioral Endocrinology and Experimental Economics: Testosterone and Social Decision Making
Published on: March 2, 2011
15.8K
Moral Chivalry: Gender and Harm Sensitivity Predict Costly Altruism
Oriel FeldmanHall1, Tim Dalgleish2, Davy Evans3
1Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY, USA.
Social Psychological and Personality Science
|August 2, 2016
Summary
Gender bias influences moral decision-making. Harm considerations, not fairness, predict altruism, showing moral choices depend on social context and gender dynamics.
Area of Science:
- Moral Psychology
- Social Cognition
- Behavioral Ethics
Background:
- Moral perceptions of harm and fairness guide decision-making.
- Target gender historically influences perceptions of harm and fairness.
- Understanding gender's role in moral cognition is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how moral orientations (harm and justice) and target gender affect altruistic behavior.
- To determine if harm and fairness considerations differentially impact costly altruism.
- To explore the conditional nature of moral choices based on social dyad characteristics.
Main Methods:
- Multi-study experimental design.
- Manipulation of target gender and assessment of moral orientations.
- Measurement of altruistic behavior and costly actions.
Main Results:
- Target gender significantly biases readiness to engage in harmful actions.
- Decider's harm considerations modulate costly altruism.
- Fairness considerations did not significantly modulate costly altruism.
Conclusions:
- Moral choices are conditional on the social context, specifically the gender of individuals involved.
- Gender bias and harm considerations significantly influence moral cognition and altruistic behavior.
- Social dynamics, including gender, play a critical role in moral decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Altruism
48.5K
Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
48.5K
Egoism and Altruism
93.9K
Voluntary behavior with the intent to help other people is called prosocial behavior. Why do people help other people? Is personal benefit such as feeling good about oneself the only reason people help one another?
93.9K
Inclusive Fitness
43.4K
Most altruistic behavior—in which one animal helps another at a cost to themselves—occurs between relatives. Scientists think these altruistic behaviors evolved because they increase the inclusive fitness of the animal providing help.
43.4K
Overview of Cell Signaling
25.7K
Despite the protective membrane that separates a cell from the environment, cells need the ability to detect and respond to environmental changes. Additionally, cells often need to communicate with one another. Unicellular and multicellular organisms use a variety of cell signaling mechanisms to communicate with the environment.
Cells respond to many types of information, often through receptor proteins positioned on the membrane. For example, skin cells respond to and transmit touch...
Cells respond to many types of information, often through receptor proteins positioned on the membrane. For example, skin cells respond to and transmit touch...
25.7K
Social Exchange Theory
669
As formulated by John Thibaut and Harold Kelley, Social Exchange Theory explains human relationships as economic-like exchanges that maximize rewards and minimize costs. This theory suggests that individuals engage in relationships to gain benefits and reduce burdens, similar to economic transactions. It has been widely applied to various types of relationships, including romantic, professional, and social interactions.Rewards and Costs in RelationshipsRelationship rewards include emotional...
669
Social Exchange Theory
40.9K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.9K

