Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Standardizing the Development of Amine-Based Silica Composites as CO2 Adsorbents for Direct Air Capture
Published on: September 29, 2023
Cutting the cost of carbon capture: a case for carbon capture and utilization
Lennart Joos1, Johanna M Huck2, Veronique Van Speybroeck1
1Center for Molecular Modeling, Ghent University, B-9052 Zwijnaarde, Belgium. veronique.vanspeybroeck@ugent.be.
Abstract:
A significant part of the cost for carbon capture and storage (CCS) is related to the compression of captured CO2 to its supercritical state, at 150 bar and typically 99% purity. These stringent conditions may however not always be necessary for specific cases of carbon capture and utilization (CCU). In this manuscript, we investigate how much the parasitic energy of an adsorbent-based carbon capture process may be lowered by utilizing CO2 at 1 bar and adapting the final purity requirement for CO2 from 99% to 70% or 50%. We compare different CO2 sources: the flue gases of coal-fired or natural gas-fired power plants and ambient air. We evaluate the carbon capture performance of over 60 nanoporous materials and determine the influence of the initial and final CO2 purity on the parasitic energy of the carbon capture process. Moreover, we demonstrate the underlying principles of the parasitic energy minimization in more detail using the commercially available NaX zeolite. Finally, the calculated utilization cost of CO2 is compared with the reported prices for CO2 and published costs for CCS.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bioremediation
Carbon-dioxide Fixation
The Carbon Cycle
¹³C NMR: ¹H–¹³C Decoupling
A broadband decoupling technique is used to simplify these complex, sometimes overlapping, signals. Broadband decoupling relies on a...
The Calvin Benson Cycle
C4 Pathway and CAM
C4 Pathway
The C4 pathway is used by plants such as...

