A systematic review of discontinued trials suggested that most reasons for recruitment failure were preventable
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
Matthias Briel1, Kelechi Kalu Olu2, Erik von Elm3
1Department of Clinical Research, Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel, Spitalstrasse 12, 4031 Basel, Switzerland; Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1, Canada.
Objective:
To collect and classify reported reasons for recruitment failure in discontinued randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and to assess reporting quality.
Methods:
We systematically searched MEDLINE and EMBASE (2010-2014) and a previous cohort of RCTs for published RCTs reporting trial discontinuation due to poor recruitment. Teams of two investigators selected eligible RCTs working independently and extracted information using standardized forms. We used an iterative approach to classify reasons for poor recruitment.
Results:
We included 172 RCTs discontinued due to poor recruitment (including 26 conference abstracts and 63 industry-funded RCTs). Of those, 131 (76%) reported one or more reasons for discontinuation due to poor recruitment. We identified 28 different reasons for recruitment failure; most frequently mentioned were overestimation of prevalence of eligible participants and prejudiced views of recruiters and participants on trial interventions. Few RCTs reported relevant details about the recruitment process such as how eligible participants were identified, the number of patients assessed for eligibility, and who actually recruited participants.
Conclusion:
Our classification could serve as a checklist to assist investigators in the planning of RCTs. Most reasons for recruitment failure seem preventable with a pilot study that applies the planned informed consent procedure.
Insights
Many randomized controlled trials (RCTs) fail due to poor participant recruitment. Overestimating eligible participants and negative views on interventions were common reasons, highlighting the need for better planning and pilot studies.
Area of Science:
- Clinical Trials
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Recruitment failure is a significant cause for the discontinuation of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
- Understanding the reasons behind recruitment failure is crucial for improving future trial design and success rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically collect and categorize reported reasons for recruitment failure in discontinued RCTs.
- To evaluate the quality of reporting regarding recruitment challenges in published RCTs.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted on MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for RCTs discontinued due to poor recruitment between 2010 and 2014.
- Information was extracted by two independent investigators using standardized forms, and reasons for recruitment failure were classified through an iterative approach.
Main Results:
- Out of 172 included RCTs, 131 (76%) reported reasons for discontinuation due to recruitment failure.
- Twenty-eight distinct reasons were identified, with the most frequent being overestimation of eligible participant prevalence and negative perceptions of trial interventions.
- Reporting on key recruitment process details, such as participant identification and screening numbers, was often inadequate.
Conclusions:
- The developed classification system can serve as a checklist to aid investigators in planning RCTs.
- Many recruitment failures appear preventable, suggesting the utility of pilot studies incorporating planned informed consent procedures.
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Longitudinal Research
Blind Procedures
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...

