Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

4.0K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
4.0K
Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

26.1K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
26.1K
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

201
Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
201
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

13.8K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
13.8K
Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers01:13

Bioequivalence studies: Biowaivers

374
In certain scenarios, in vitro dissolution tests can replace in vivo bioequivalence studies. This is particularly true when a drug product, though available in varying strengths, maintains proportional similarity in its active and inactive ingredients. In such cases, the need for in vivo bioequivalence studies for lower strength variants may be waived, provided dissolution tests and in vivo studies on the highest strength yield satisfactory results.Bioequivalence can be indicated through...
374
Controls in Experiments01:13

Controls in Experiments

18.7K
When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...
18.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Public Views on Whether the Use of Pharmaceutical Neuroenhancements Should Be Allowed.

Neurology·2024
Same author

Ways of Debating Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia: Implications for Psychiatry.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2021
Same author

Should age matter in COVID-19 triage? A deliberative study.

Journal of medical ethics·2021
Same author

Multimedia Aided Consent for Alzheimer's Disease Research.

Clinical gerontologist·2017
Same author

Activating ESR1 mutations in hormone-resistant metastatic breast cancer.

Nature genetics·2013
Same author

Talking with patients about dying.

The New England journal of medicine·2013
Same journal

"Wouldn't It Be Easier to Be Burned at the Stake?": Schizophrenia and Deinstitutionalization in <i>Bitter Medicine</i>.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

The Mental Health Crisis of Rural America: Understanding Supply and Demand.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

The Final Act of Care: Accuracy in Cause of Death Statements.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Existential Competence: Redefining Clinical Excellence Beyond Health Optimization.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Making Fun of Medicine: Resisting Medicine's Principalities.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
Same journal

Courage, Conviction, Resolve: The Story of Dr. Gui Xi'en.

Perspectives in biology and medicine·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

10.4K

Clinical Trials Without Consent?

Scott Y Kim

    Perspectives in Biology and Medicine
    |August 9, 2016
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Clinical research ethics are re-examined, questioning the necessity of informed consent. A systematic analysis found only one of five trials without consent ethically justified, impacting current U.S. regulations.

    More Related Videos

    A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
    04:53

    A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

    Published on: September 20, 2019

    11.4K
    E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
    06:28

    E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

    Published on: August 1, 2019

    9.3K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

    Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
    07:48

    Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

    Published on: November 26, 2015

    10.4K
    A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
    04:53

    A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition

    Published on: September 20, 2019

    11.4K
    E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
    06:28

    E-Patient Counseling Trial E-PACO: Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy

    Published on: August 1, 2019

    9.3K

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Ethics
    • Clinical Research Methodology
    • Informed Consent

    Background:

    • Revisiting ethical debates on clinical research without participant consent, 50 years after Beecher's influential article.
    • Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical research, but exceptions are sometimes considered.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To systematically analyze the ethical justification for conducting clinical research without informed consent.
    • To evaluate existing conditions used to bypass consent requirements in clinical trials.

    Main Methods:

    • Systematic analysis of five clinical trials conducted or proposed without participant consent.
    • Review and critical assessment of conditions cited to justify waiving informed consent.

    Main Results:

    • Only specific conditions were found to be necessary for bypassing informed consent.
    • Of the five analyzed trials, only one cluster randomized trial without consent was clearly justified.
    • The ethical justification for bypassing consent in the other four trials remains questionable.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides a framework for interpreting U.S. regulations on waivers and alterations of informed consent.
    • Highlights the need for careful ethical scrutiny when considering research without consent.
    • Suggests that most historical cases of bypassing consent in clinical research were not ethically sound.