Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Barnes Maze Testing Strategies with Small and Large Rodent Models
Published on: February 26, 2014
Hysteresis and Related Error Mechanisms in the NIST Watt Balance Experiment
J P Schwarz1, R Liu1, D B Newell1
1National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-0001.
Abstract:
The NIST watt balance experiment is being completely rebuilt after its 1998 determination of the Planck constant. That measurement yielded a result with an approximately 1×10(-7) relative standard uncertainty. Because the goal of the new incarnation of the experiment is a ten-fold decrease in uncertainty, it has been necessary to reexamine many sources of systematic error. Hysteresis effects account for a substantial portion of the projected uncertainty budget. They arise from mechanical, magnetic, and thermal sources. The new experiment incorporates several improvements in the apparatus to address these issues, including stiffer components for transferring the mass standard on and off the balance, better servo control of the balance, better pivot materials, and the incorporation of erasing techniques into the mass transfer servo system. We have carried out a series of tests of hysteresis sources on a separate system, and apply their results to the watt apparatus. The studies presented here suggest that our improvements can be expected to reduce hysteresis signals by at least a factor of 10-perhaps as much as a factor of 50-over the 1998 experiment.
Related Concept Videos
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
NMR Spectrometers: Resolution and Error Correction
Random and Systematic Errors
Wheatstone Bridge
Thus, for accurate resistance measurements, a...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

