Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Surgical Techniques for Catheter Placement and 5/6 Nephrectomy in Murine Models of Peritoneal Dialysis
Published on: July 19, 2018
A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study on Interleukin-6 Removal and Induction by a new Hemodialyzer
Takatoshi Kakuta1,2, Hirotaka Komaba2, Nobuyoshi Takagi3
1Division of Nephrology, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Hachioji, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract:
We compared interleukin-6 (IL-6) removal and induction between conventional polysulfone (Con) and TORAYLIGHT NV (NV) dialyzers in hemodialysis patients. Twenty patients on Con with high IL-6 concentrations (2.7-8.5 pg/mL) were randomized to Con or NV group. Dialyzer performance was determined in NV group while patients were on Con and after being switched onto NV. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) response index (ERI) was assessed every 4 months for one year. IL-6 clearance was comparable between Con and NV. IL-6 removal rates were comparable for the first 1 h, but were higher with NV for the entire session (P = 0.03). Before-to-during-dialysis IL-6 concentration ratios were lower with NV on the venous side after the session (P = 0.03). During the one-year study, hemoglobin was lower in Con group than in NV group at month 8 (P = 0.046). ERI decreased in NV and increased in Con group, with a significant difference between the groups (P = 0.002). NV and Con are comparable in removing IL-6 and both induce IL-6. However, the data suggest that NV induces less IL-6, which may reduce the risk of ESA hyporesponsiveness.
Related Concept Videos
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis
Extracorporeal Removal of Drugs: Hemoperfusion and Hemofiltration
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Acute Kidney Injury V: Interprofessional Care
Dialysis

