Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Selection

Types of Selection

Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...

Mechanism of Ciliary Motion

Mechanism of Ciliary Motion

The ciliary structures were first seen in 1647 by Antonie Leeuwenhoek while observing the protozoans. In lower organisms, these appendages are responsible for cell movement, while in higher organisms, these appendages help in the movement of the extracellular fluids within the body cavities.
The cilia are made up of microtubules in a 9+2 arrangement, with nine microtubule doublet ring bundles, surrounding a pair of central singlet microtubule bundles. The doublet microtubule bundles are...

Limits to Natural Selection

Limits to Natural Selection

Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.

Frequency-dependent Selection

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.

Position-effect Variegation

Position-effect Variegation

In 1928, a German botanist Emil Heitz observed the moss nuclei with a DNA binding dye. He observed that while some chromatin regions decondense and spread out in the interphase nucleus, others do not. He termed them euchromatin and heterochromatin, respectively. He proposed that the heterochromatin regions reflect a functionally inactive state of the genome. It was later confirmed that heterochromatin is transcriptionally repressed, and euchromatin is transcriptionally active chromatin.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The functional organization of retinal input to the mouse superior colliculus.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Homotypic dendritic interactions constrain growth and receptor distribution in Drosophila T4 neurons without affecting orientation or function.

Development (Cambridge, England)·2026

Same author

Population Morphology Implies a Common Developmental Blueprint for <i>Drosophila</i> Motion Detectors.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Same author

To jump or not to jump: comparing effects of phenotypic plasticity on the visual responses and escape behavior of locusts and grasshoppers.

Journal of neurophysiology·2025

Same author

Polyadic synapses introduce unique wiring architectures in T5 cells of Drosophila.

PloS one·2025

Same author

Differential temporal filtering in the fly optic lobe.

Journal of computational neuroscience·2025

Same journal

Non-canonical amino acid incorporation enables minimally disruptive labeling of stress granule and TDP-43 proteinopathy.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Analysis of dendritic input currents during place field dynamics.

eLife·2026

Same journal

TopoMetry systematically learns and evaluates the latent geometry of single-cell data.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Navigating the path: Advice to physician-scientists on choosing a clinical specialty.

eLife·2026

Same journal

Neural activity profiles reveal overlapping, intermingled subpopulations spanning area borders in mouse sensorimotor cortex.

eLife·2026

Same journal

The exquisite mechanics of a tsetse bite.

eLife·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Magnetic Tether System to Investigate Visual and Olfactory Mediated Flight Control in Drosophila

A Magnetic Tether System to Investigate Visual and Olfactory Mediated Flight Control in Drosophila

Published on: November 21, 2008

Complementary mechanisms create direction selectivity in the fly.

Juergen Haag¹, Alexander Arenz¹, Etienne Serbe¹

¹Max Planck Institute of Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.

|August 10, 2016

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Neurons in the fruit fly optic lobe use two mechanisms to detect visual motion direction. These findings reveal how elementary motion detection works in T4 neurons.

Keywords:

D. melanogaster Neurogenetics computer model motion vision neuroscience

More Related Videos

A Behavioral Assay for Mechanosensation of MARCM-based Clones in Drosophila melanogaster

A Behavioral Assay for Mechanosensation of MARCM-based Clones in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 30, 2015

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

Published on: June 16, 2008

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

A Magnetic Tether System to Investigate Visual and Olfactory Mediated Flight Control in Drosophila

A Magnetic Tether System to Investigate Visual and Olfactory Mediated Flight Control in Drosophila

Published on: November 21, 2008

A Behavioral Assay for Mechanosensation of MARCM-based Clones in Drosophila melanogaster

A Behavioral Assay for Mechanosensation of MARCM-based Clones in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: December 30, 2015

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

Operant Learning of Drosophila at the Torque Meter

Published on: June 16, 2008

Area of Science:

Neuroscience
Computational Neuroscience
Sensory Systems

Background:

Neural computation of visual motion direction is a fundamental problem.
Two proposed mechanisms are preferred direction enhancement and null direction suppression.
Directional selectivity emerges early in the Drosophila optic lobe, specifically in T4 and T5 neurons.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the mechanisms underlying directional selectivity in T4 neurons.
To determine how elementary motion detection is implemented in the fly's visual system.

Main Methods:

Single T4 neurons in the Drosophila optic lobe were recorded.
Visual stimuli were presented as sequences of individual columns using a telescope.

Main Results:

Both preferred direction enhancement and null direction suppression mechanisms were identified.
These mechanisms are spatially segregated within different sub-regions of the T4 neuron's receptive field.
High directional selectivity is present in these primary motion-sensing neurons.

Conclusions:

The study elucidates the dual mechanisms responsible for elementary motion detection in T4 neurons.
This provides a comprehensive understanding of how flies sense visual motion direction.
The findings represent a significant advance in understanding neural computation for motion detection.