Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Author Spotlight: Deciphering the Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Gesture in Communication
Published on: January 26, 2024
When do high-context communicators speak up? Exploring contextual communication orientation and employee voice
Anna-Katherine Ward1, Elizabeth C Ravlin2, Brian S Klaas2
1Pamplin College of Business, Virginia Tech.
High-context communication styles reduce workplace voice, especially promotive voice. However, this effect is less pronounced for prohibitive voice and can be mitigated by strong leader-member exchange (LMX) relationships.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Behavior
- Communication Studies
- Social Psychology
Background:
- High-context communication is linked to reduced employee voice.
- Understanding boundary conditions is crucial for high-/low-context theory.
- Distinguishing between types of voice (prohibitive and promotive) is important.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore boundary conditions for the relationship between contextual communication orientation and employee voice.
- To investigate how different types of voice (prohibitive vs. promotive) are affected.
- To examine the moderating role of leader-member exchange (LMX) on this relationship.
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted to examine the relationship between contextual communication orientation and voice.
- Participants' communication orientation and voice behaviors were assessed.
- Leader-member exchange (LMX) was measured as a potential moderator.
Main Results:
- The negative association between high-context communication orientation and voice was weaker for prohibitive voice compared to promotive voice.
- Leader-member exchange (LMX) moderated the relationship between contextual communication orientation and promotive voice, weakening the negative effect at high LMX.
- The moderating effect of LMX was not significant for prohibitive voice.
Conclusions:
- The relationship between communication orientation and voice is nuanced and depends on the type of voice.
- Leader-member exchange can buffer the negative impact of high-context communication on promotive voice.
- Future research should consider the interplay of communication styles, voice types, and relational factors.
Related Concept Videos
Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Self Within Cultural Contexts
Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Barriers to Effective Communication I
Communication barriers include the following:
Physiological barriers: They are limitations caused by a person's health condition or disability, such as hearing loss, poor eyesight, illness, or unconsciousness. An example to overcome this...

