Survival After Rate-Responsive Programming in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy-Defibrillator Implants
Brian Olshansky1, Mark Richards2, Arjun Sharma2
1From the Mercy Hospital, Mason City, IA (B.O.); ProMedica Cardiology, Toledo, OH (M.R.); Boston Scientific, St Paul, MN (A.S., N.W., P.J., D.P.); and Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH (B.L.W.). brian-olshansky@uiowa.edu.
Insights
Rate-responsive pacing (DDDR) improved survival in cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) patients with a high heart rate score (HRSc) of 70% or more. Lower HRSc patients did not benefit from DDDR pacing.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Rate-responsive pacing (DDDR) versus nonrate-responsive pacing (DDD) has shown no survival benefit for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implants.
- The heart rate score (HRSc), an indicator of heart rate variation, may predict survival.
- Hypothesized that high-risk HRSc CRT-D patients will have improved survival with DDDR versus DDD alone.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the survival benefit of DDDR pacing in CRT-D patients with a high heart rate score (HRSc).
- To determine if DDDR pacing improves survival in CRT-D patients with a baseline HRSc of 70% or higher.
Main Methods:
- Utilized LATITUDE remote monitoring data from CRT-D patients (2006-2011) programmed initially to DDD.
- Compared patients reprogrammed to DDDR with propensity-matched DDD controls, adjusting for key clinical variables.
- Assessed survival using the Social Security Death Index and analyzed HRSc changes with DDDR reprogramming.
Main Results:
- DDDR programming in CRT-D patients was associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.77; P<0.001).
- Patients with baseline HRSc ≥70% showed improved HRSc with DDDR and significantly better survival (hazard ratio = 0.74; P<0.001).
- Patients with HRSc <70% experienced no survival benefit from DDDR reprogramming, despite HRSc improvement.
Conclusions:
- In CRT-D patients with HRSc ≥70%, DDDR reprogramming improved HRSc and was associated with survival.
- Patients with lower HRSc (<70%) did not experience a change in survival with DDDR programming.
- Baseline HRSc is a critical factor in determining the survival benefit of DDDR pacing in CRT-D patients.
Background:
Rate-responsive pacing (DDDR) versus nonrate-responsive pacing (DDD) has shown no survival benefit for patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) implants. The heart rate score (HRSc), an indicator of heart rate variation, may predict survival. We hypothesized that high-risk HRSc CRT-D patients will have improved survival with DDDR versus DDD alone.
Methods And Results:
All CRT-D patients in LATITUDE remote monitoring (2006-2011), programmed DDD, had HRSc calculated at first data upload after implant (median 1.4 months). Patients subsequently reprogrammed to DDDR 7.6 median months later were compared with a propensity-matched DDD group and followed for 21.4 median months by remote monitoring. Data were adjusted for age, sex, lower rate limit, percent atrial pacing, percent biventricular pacing, and implant year. The social security death index was used to identify deaths. Remote monitoring provided programming and histogram data. DDDR programming in CRT-D patients was associated with improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio =0.77; P<0.001). However, only those with baseline HRSc ≥70% (2308/6164) had improved HRSc with DDDR (from 88±9% to 78±15%; P<0.001) and improved survival (hazard ratio =0.74; P<0.001). Patients with a high baseline HRSc and significant improvement over time were more likely to survive (hazard ratio =0.63; P=0.006). For patients with HRSc <70%, DDDR reprogramming increased the HRSc from 46±11% to 50±15% (P<0.001); survival did not change. The HRSc did not change with DDD pacing over time.
Conclusions:
In CRT-D patients with HRSc ≥70%, DDDR reprogramming improved the HRSc and was associated with survival. Patients with lower HRSc had no change in survival with DDDR programming.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac...
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy


