Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Multiple Regression01:25

Multiple Regression

4.3K
Multiple regression assesses a linear relationship between one response or dependent variable and two or more independent variables. It has many practical applications.
Farmers can use multiple regression to determine the crop yield based on more than one factor, such as water availability, fertilizer, soil properties, etc. Here, the crop yield is the response or dependent variable as it depends on the other independent variables. The analysis requires the construction of a scatter plot...
4.3K
Purposive Learning01:22

Purposive Learning

563
E. C. Tolman emphasized the purposiveness of behavior — the idea that much of our behavior is goal-directed. For instance, employees who aim for a promotion work diligently to meet their targets. Tolman argued that when classical conditioning and operant conditioning occur, the organism acquires certain expectations. In classical conditioning, a child might fear a dog because they expect it to bite. In operant conditioning, a person might consistently work overtime because they expect a...
563
Measures of Central Tendency02:16

Measures of Central Tendency

22.7K
The "center" of a data set is also a way of describing location. The two most widely used measures of the "center" of the data are the mean (average) and the median. The words "mean" and "average" are often used interchangeably. The substitution of one word for the other is common practice. The technical term is "arithmetic mean" and "average" is technically a center location. However, in practice among non-statisticians,...
22.7K
Measurement: Standard Units03:38

Measurement: Standard Units

85.0K
Every measurement provides three kinds of information: the size or magnitude of the measurement (a number), a standard of comparison for the measurement (a unit), and an indication of the uncertainty of the measurement. While the number and unit are explicitly represented when a quantity is written, the uncertainty is an aspect of the errors in the measurement results.
85.0K
Variability: Analysis01:11

Variability: Analysis

613
Measures of variability are statistical metrics that reveal the dispersion pattern within a dataset. They are pivotal in biostatistics, providing insights into the heterogeneity within health and biological data. Variability signifies the degree to which data points diverge from one another, helping researchers understand the potential range of values and associated uncertainty within the data.
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
613
Measures of Intelligence01:29

Measures of Intelligence

8.8K
Psychologists measure intelligence by using standardized tests that produce a score known as the intelligence quotient or IQ. To understand IQ tests, it's important to recognize the key principles behind their construction: validity, reliability, and standardization.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
8.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining Factor Score Distributions to Determine the Nature of Latent Spaces.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

A Multidimensional Ideal Point Item Response Theory Model for Binary Data.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

The Specific Analysis of Structural Equation Models.

Multivariate behavioral research·2016
Same author

Structural Models and the Art of Approximation.

Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science·2015
Same author

The nature and structure of psychological distress in people at high risk for melanoma: a factor analytic study.

Psycho-oncology·2011
Same author

Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.

Psychological methods·2002
Same journal

BAYESIAN MIXED MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING FOR AUDITORY PROCESSING.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Testing linear hypotheses in repeated measures generalized linear models using external information.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

When Do Unifactorial Items Increase the Reliability?

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Longitudinal Designs for Diagnostic Models: Identification and Estimation.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Modeling Rare Events and Nonmonotone Nonignorable Missingness of Time-Varying Outcomes and Predictors in Binary Time-Series Daily Diary Data: A Bayesian Selection Model.

Psychometrika·2026
Same journal

Revelle's Beta: The Wait Is Over-Computation Becomes Possible.

Psychometrika·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K

Measuring Latent Quantities.

Roderick P McDonald1

  • 1The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia. rmcdonal@cyrus.psych.illinois.edu.

Psychometrika
|August 14, 2016
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study distinguishes between measures and predictors of latent variables, impacting various statistical models. Understanding this difference is crucial for accurate measurement and prediction in research.

Keywords:
Bayes predictorscalibrationregression predictorsstandard error of measurement

More Related Videos

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Mar 16, 2026

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits
08:27

Applying an eMASS Customization Program as a Research Tool to Evaluate Consumer Benefits

Published on: September 27, 2019

7.3K
Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills
06:52

Using Cholesky Decomposition to Explore Individual Differences in Longitudinal Relations between Reading Skills

Published on: September 17, 2019

6.8K
Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding
06:33

Decomposing the Variance in Reading Comprehension to Reveal the Unique and Common Effects of Language and Decoding

Published on: October 11, 2018

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Psychometrics
  • Statistical Modeling
  • Quantitative Psychology

Background:

  • Latent variable modeling is central to many quantitative fields.
  • Existing frameworks often conflate the roles of measures and predictors.
  • A clear distinction is needed for robust statistical inference.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and delineate the distinction between measures and predictors of latent variables.
  • To explore the implications of this distinction for established statistical models.
  • To provide a unified framework for understanding measurement and prediction.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of measurement and prediction.
  • Examination of consequences for true-score, factor, Structural Equation Models (SEM), longitudinal, multilevel, and item-response models.
  • Distribution-free treatment of calibration and error-of-measurement.

Main Results:

  • Measures and predictors have fundamentally different roles and properties.
  • The distinction clarifies interpretation issues in various complex statistical models.
  • A unified approach to error-of-measurement and calibration is presented.

Conclusions:

  • Differentiating measures from predictors enhances the validity of latent variable analyses.
  • This distinction offers a more precise understanding of statistical model assumptions and applications.
  • The proposed framework improves the theoretical and practical aspects of psychometric modeling.