Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 16, 2026
Author Spotlight: Comparative Imaging of Neural Activity in Awake and Freely Moving States
Published on: January 19, 2024
Outcome in patient-specific PEEK cranioplasty: A two-center cohort study of 40 implants
J Jonkergouw1, S E C M van de Vijfeijken2, E Nout3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Tilburg, Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, 5022 GC, Tilburg, The Netherlands; Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Objective:
The best material choice for cranioplasty following craniectomy remains a subject to discussion. Complication rates after cranioplasty tend to be high. Computer-assisted 3-dimensional modelling of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) was recently introduced for cranial reconstruction. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient- and surgery-related characteristics and risk factors that predispose patients to cranioplasty complications.
Material And Methods:
This retrospective study included a total of 40 cranial PEEK implants in 38 patients, performed at two reference centers in the Netherlands from 2011 to 2014. Complications were registered and patient- and surgery-related data were carefully analysed.
Results:
The overall complication rate of PEEK cranioplasty was 28%. Complications included infection (13 %), postoperative haematoma (10 %), cerebrospinal fluid leak (2.5 %) and wound-related problems (2.5 %). All postoperative infections required removal of the implant. Nonetheless removed implants could be successfully re-used after re-sterilization.
Conclusion:
Although overall complication rates after PEEK cranioplasty remain high, outcomes are satisfactory, as our results compare favourably to recent literature reports on cranial vault reconstruction.
